2019
DOI: 10.1111/aor.13539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative blood product transfusion of two different perfusion strategies on pediatric patients undergoing aortic arch surgery

Abstract: Simple regional cerebral perfusion (SRCP) or cerebro‐myocardial perfusion (CMP) is selectively used in one‐stage complex aortic arch malformation repair. This analysis was performed to investigate the effect of CMP and SRCP on perioperative blood product consumption, and to evaluate whether these two strategies have different effects on the clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis of 284 children with complicated aortic malformation from January 2010 to June 2018 was performed. The overall cohort was divide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The better vascular protection effects of less bleeding, transfusions, and higher postoperative hemoglobin in the MP group was also the probable reason for shortening the posthospital stay. It was similar to pediatric arch surgery, which could reduce chest tube time and platelet transfusion [ 19 ]. Although there are several factors (such as surgical skills, transfusion indications, priming or dilution of CPB circuits, and methods of lost blood collection [ 11 ]) that influence blood loss and transfusion, we thought that the main reason should be incision and cannulation reduction in the MP group, which is consistent with Lyu’s research that a minimally invasive approach could decrease transfusion in patients with type A dissection [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better vascular protection effects of less bleeding, transfusions, and higher postoperative hemoglobin in the MP group was also the probable reason for shortening the posthospital stay. It was similar to pediatric arch surgery, which could reduce chest tube time and platelet transfusion [ 19 ]. Although there are several factors (such as surgical skills, transfusion indications, priming or dilution of CPB circuits, and methods of lost blood collection [ 11 ]) that influence blood loss and transfusion, we thought that the main reason should be incision and cannulation reduction in the MP group, which is consistent with Lyu’s research that a minimally invasive approach could decrease transfusion in patients with type A dissection [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%