2022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008239.pub5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our reported improvements in postoperative complication rates and readmission rates align with findings previously reported by other surgical specialties with the implementation of ERAS [21]. Multiple metaanalyses found that enhanced recovery strategies reduced hospital stay [22,23]. However, there were few reports on the role of TU-LESS with the implementation of ERAS for the treatment of malignant diseases.…”
Section: Interpretation (In Light Of Other Evidence)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our reported improvements in postoperative complication rates and readmission rates align with findings previously reported by other surgical specialties with the implementation of ERAS [21]. Multiple metaanalyses found that enhanced recovery strategies reduced hospital stay [22,23]. However, there were few reports on the role of TU-LESS with the implementation of ERAS for the treatment of malignant diseases.…”
Section: Interpretation (In Light Of Other Evidence)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, previous studies have found a substantial difference in quality of life between the ERAS program and standard care, which indicates that ERAS is beneficial (71,72). There is also evidence that the LOS of patients treated with the ERAS program is shorter (73). This meta-analysis indicated significant heterogeneity among studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Among health professionals, the reasons for even initial resistance to change were due to two main reasons which are largely confirmed: specific and time-rooted beliefs of healthcare professionals and the lack of knowledge of scientific evidence. On the other side, a recent review claimed the need for a higher evidence proving the advantages reported in the various studies published [36]. However, discussing ERAS in a study, a crossover effect is an import issue that is difficult to avoid, given the nature of the pragmatical and well recognizable care.…”
Section: What Type Of Barriers?mentioning
confidence: 99%