F ashions come and fashions go. Changes in clothing, automobiles, and restaurants follow popular trends and are often periodic and cyclical. Ideally, medical change is driven not by fashion but instead by concepts of effectiveness and safety, and these concepts should improve and refine as better data become available. Trends hold true also in anesthesia practice, where for example intraoperative opioid selection has swung from long-duration to ultra-short duration and then at least partially back again. 1 Recent years have witnessed a new fashion in anesthesiology: "opioid-free anesthesia." For some, the opioid pendulum has swung clear past rational opioid use in balanced anesthesia to eliminating opioids intraoperatively and sometimes also postoperatively (opioid-free analgesia). Eradicating opioids from intraoperative and postoperative analgesic plans has been termed a "movement," 2 and like many "movements," it has attracted passionate proponents and spirited debate. 3,4 Nevertheless, clinical research and peer-reviewed evidence on the potential benefits and risks of opioid-free anesthesia have remained scant, needed, and called for. 5-7 This issue of Anesthesiology features two articles on opioid-free anesthesia that bring some light to the heat of the debate. The original investigation by Beloeil et al. 8 reports the results of a randomized clinical trial of balanced anesthesia with either remifentanil or dexmedetomidine (opioid-free). The review by Shanthanna et al. 9 provides a narrative exposition of opioid-free versus opioid-sparing approaches in the perioperative period. These articles are timely and important. The clinical trial 8 was investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group, and single-blind, conducted in 10 centers in France, with an independent data and safety monitoring board to oversee the conduct and review safety data. Patients undergoing