2018
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery

Abstract: A variety of existing perioperative informatics tools offer clinicians and researchers the opportunity to improve the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac and vascular surgery. Many of these tools can be used to improve the reliability of the care delivery process through the application of clinical decision support tools and/or quality improvement methodologies at a number of junctures. In this review, the authors will offer a concise overview of the existing perioperative in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Through the MPOG infrastructure, perioperative data are aggregated via automated extraction followed by clinician validation, including a preoperative anesthesia history and physical; intraoperative observations (eg, physiologic monitors, ventilator data); interventions (eg, airway documentation, medications, fluids/blood products, cardiopulmonary bypass start/stop); providers; laboratory values; and administrative and billing data. 12 Highly structured, deidentified data are transmitted to a central repository on a monthly basis and are made accessible to researchers as regulated by a committee of representatives from all participating institutions and to quality improvement programs as governed by the MPOG Quality Improvement Committee. At selected MPOG institutions, perioperative EHR data are integrated with surgical registry data (eg, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery and General Thoracic Surgery databases and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program), enabling associations to be studied between perioperative care processes available via MPOG and surgical outcomes available via surgical outcomes registries.…”
Section: The Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group As a Learning Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Through the MPOG infrastructure, perioperative data are aggregated via automated extraction followed by clinician validation, including a preoperative anesthesia history and physical; intraoperative observations (eg, physiologic monitors, ventilator data); interventions (eg, airway documentation, medications, fluids/blood products, cardiopulmonary bypass start/stop); providers; laboratory values; and administrative and billing data. 12 Highly structured, deidentified data are transmitted to a central repository on a monthly basis and are made accessible to researchers as regulated by a committee of representatives from all participating institutions and to quality improvement programs as governed by the MPOG Quality Improvement Committee. At selected MPOG institutions, perioperative EHR data are integrated with surgical registry data (eg, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery and General Thoracic Surgery databases and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program), enabling associations to be studied between perioperative care processes available via MPOG and surgical outcomes available via surgical outcomes registries.…”
Section: The Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group As a Learning Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional components to perioperative information systems are used to manage operating room staffing, patient flow, and case scheduling. [ 42 ]. Core competencies of clinical informaticians in the perioperative environment include understanding these systems and leading efforts at system implementation and ongoing optimization.…”
Section: Management Of Perioperative Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Intraoperative medication-related CDS on the market currently is often limited to simple reminders (e.g., to redose antibiotics, monitor blood glucose, or administer postoperative nausea prophylaxis). [27][28][29] Poor CDS design can lead to negative consequences, such as AMEs and increased provider burden. [31][32][33] While there is a paucity of data on user-centered design of intraoperative CDS applications, the usability of CDS applications has been well studied outside of the OR.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%