Perioperative monitoring of neuromuscular function

Kopman, Aaron F.

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974083.024

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 138 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Electromyography has been suggested as an alternative gold standard 12 ; however, not all currently available electromyograph neuromuscular blockade monitors deliver reliable results. 13 Many of the original studies of neuromuscular blockade were performed using mechanomyography with commercially available Grass force transducers 14 that are no longer produced and not widely available. We and others have assumed that a modern mechanomyograph built using currently available parts would give results comparable to the archival equipment, but this has not previously been tested.…”

Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of a Modern Digital Mechanomyograph to a Mechanomyograph Utilizing an Archival Grass Force Transducer

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mechanomyography is the traditional gold standard research technique for quantitative assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Mechanomyography directly measures the isometric force generated by the thumb in response to ulnar nerve stimulation. Researchers must construct their own mechanomyographs since commercial instruments are no longer available. We constructed a mechanomyograph and compared its performance against an archival mechanomyography system from the 1970s that utilized an FT-10 Grass force transducer, hypothesizing that train-of-four ratios recorded on each device would be equivalent. Methods A mechanomyograph was constructed using 3D printed components and modern electronics. An archival mechanomyography system was assembled from original components, including an FT-10 Grass force transducer. Signal digitization for computerized data collection was utilized instead of the original paper strip chart recorder. Both devices were calibrated with standard weights to demonstrate linear voltage response curves. The mechanomyographs were affixed to opposite arms of patients undergoing surgery, and the train-of-four ratio was measured during the onset and recovery from rocuronium neuromuscular blockade. Results Calibration measurements exhibited a positive linear association between voltage output and calibration weights with a linear correlation coefficient of 1.00 for both mechanomyography devices. The new mechanomyograph had better precision and measurement sensitivity than the archival system, 5.3mV vs. 15.5mV and 1.6mV vs. 5.7mV, respectively (p<0.001 for both). Seven hundred sixty-seven pairs of train-of-four ratio measurements obtained from 8 patients had positive linear association (R2 = 0.94; p<0.001). Bland Altman analysis resulted in bias of 3.8% and limits of agreement of -13% and 21%. Conclusions The new mechanomyograph resulted in similar train-of-four ratio measurements compared to an archival mechanomyography system utilizing an FT-10 Grass force transducer. These results demonstrated continuity of gold standard measurement of neuromuscular blockade spanning nearly 50 years, despite significant changes in the instrumentation technology.

show abstract

Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning

confidence: 99%