2018
DOI: 10.21037/ales.2018.03.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of seromas resolved with conservative management with aspiration. Zaborowski 22 et al reported Seroma formation as the most common postoperative complication in their study in 4.2% of patients. In a number of studies Seroma following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs is reported as 3.6-7.2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of seromas resolved with conservative management with aspiration. Zaborowski 22 et al reported Seroma formation as the most common postoperative complication in their study in 4.2% of patients. In a number of studies Seroma following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs is reported as 3.6-7.2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Post operative hospital stay showed hematoma in 5 (5%) patients, seroma in 12 (12%) patients, foreign body sensation in 4 (4%) patients detail given in Table- 16,17 In our study regarding the type of hernia 68% of patients had indirect inguinal hernia while 32% of patients had direct inguinal hernia as compared to a study by Gatabi et al 18 in which 23.3% of patients in their study had direct where as 69.2% of patients had indirect hernia. In a study by zaborowski et al 22 out of the 403 patients operated 85% had unilateral inguinal hernias with 64.5% of patients having indirect, 27% of patients having direct hernias. 0.5% of patients in the study were reported as having femoral and 8% as pantaloon hernias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is now widely accepted that LIHR is a safe and effective procedure that provides a valid alternative to open techniques. 2,4,5,9,13 Published literature demonstrates reduced postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay, a more prompt return to normal activity, less wound complications and better cosmetic outcomes for LIHR when compared to traditional open surgery. 4,13,14 These advantages come with evidence that recurrence rates do not suffer with a minimallyinvasive approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,18 For these reasons, TEP repair for IH has been routinely offered in our service since 2007. 2 Despite the support of international guidelines, uptake of LIHR has been slow, and an unfortunate side effect of this hesitancy is that, not only are patients currently unable to uniformly benefit from the advantages of LIHR, but this may also continue to be the case in the future, as current trainee surgeons fail to acquire the necessary skillset from mentors to offer this approach to their patient population. 10 The incorporation of LIHR into surgical training programmes is currently limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation