Objectives: Injection drug users (IDUs) often undergo procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) as part of emergency department (ED) treatment. We compared adverse events (AEs) using a variety of sedation regimens. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a PSA safety audit in two urban EDs. Consecutive self-reported IDUs were identified, and structured data describing comorbidities, vital signs, sedation regimens (propofol [P], propofol-fentanyl [PF], fentanyl-midazolam [FM], ketofol [1:1 ketamine:propofol, KF], and ketamine-propofol [KP]) and AEs were collected. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each sedation group having an AE; the secondary outcome was the proportion of patients having a cardiovascular or respiratory AE. Results: Data were collected on 276 IDUs (78 P, 82 PF, 65 FM, 25 KF, and 26 KP), and 18 patients had AEs (6.5%, 95% CI 4.0-10.3). The AE rates were 0.0%, 8.5%, 9.2%, 12.0%, and 7.6%, respectively, with propofol having a significantly lower rate (Pearson coefficient 14.9, p 5 0.007). The cardiovascular/ respiratory AE rates were significantly different as well, with P, KP, and KF having the lowest rates (Pearson coefficient 13.3, p 5 0.01). Conclusions: For IDU PSA, the overall AE rate was 6.5%, and propofol appeared to have a significantly lower rate.
RÉ SUMÉObjectif: Les utilisateurs de drogues injectables (UDI) subissent souvent des interventions sous sé dation-analgé sie (SA) aux services des urgences. L'é tude visait à comparer la fré quence des é vé nements indé sirables (EI) lié s à la SA, administré e selon diffé rents sché mas posologiques. Le principal critè re d'é valuation é tait la proportion de patients dans chaque groupe de sé dation qui avait connu des EI; le critè re d'é valuation secondaire consistait en la proportion de patients qui avait subi des EI respiratoires ou cardiovasculaires. Ré sultats: Il y a eu collecte de donné es sur 276 UDI (78 P, 82 PF, 65 FM, 25 KF, et 26 KP), et 18 patients ont connu des EI (6.5%; IC à 95% 4.0-10.3). Les taux d'EI se sont é tablis comme suit: 0.0%, 8.5%, 9.2%, 12.0%, et 7.6%, respectivement; un taux significativement plus faible a é té enregistré dans le groupe P (coefficient de corré lation de Pearson 14.9; p 5 0.007). Les taux d'EI respiratoires ou cardiovasculaires variaient considé rablement aussi; les sché mas P, KP, et KF ont obtenu les taux les plus faibles (coefficient de corré lation de Pearson 13.3; p 5 0.01). Conclusions: Le taux global d'EI lié s à la SA chez les UDI s'é levait à 6.5%, et le sché ma P a semblé obtenir un taux sensiblement plus faible que les autres.