2017
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral arterial aneurysms in a toddler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many case reports in the current era have also revealed that SAAs are almost always associated with giant CAAs. [5][6][7]11,14,16,22,23 With these data, it is reasonable to assume that even screening patients with giant CAAs may in part reflect the incidence of SAAs in all patients with KD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many case reports in the current era have also revealed that SAAs are almost always associated with giant CAAs. [5][6][7]11,14,16,22,23 With these data, it is reasonable to assume that even screening patients with giant CAAs may in part reflect the incidence of SAAs in all patients with KD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Since the advent of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, almost all English-language literature on KD-related SAAs consist of case reports revealing that axillary, subclavian, brachial, iliac, and femoral arteries are common sites of involvement. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] To date, there are only 2 reports from the same Japanese medical center in which authors reported the incidence of SAAs in patients with KD, but, in fact, less than half of their patients with KD were screened for SAAs; it was during their study that they found that only patients with giant CAAs developed SAAs. 3,4 Although it is a reasonable assumption that there is a concomitant decrease in SAA formation with early IVIg therapy, as well as a decrease in CAAs, there are no published data to support this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no diagnostic tests available to confirm the disease. Therefore, its diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, namely, fever lasting for five days or more together with at least four of its five principal clinical features [ 4 ]. These include cervical lymphadenopathy (usually unilateral), bilateral non-exudative conjunctivitis, oral mucous membrane changes such as erythema/cracking of lips, strawberry tongue, and/or erythema of oral and pharyngeal mucosa, changes in the extremities, including erythema and edema of the hands and feet, and skin polymorphous rash [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%