2013
DOI: 10.1186/2051-1426-1-s1-o6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral blood and tumor biomarkers in patients with advanced melanoma treated with combination nivolumab (anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) and ipilimumab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, no predictive biomarkers have been validated that can be used to guide patient selection for treatment with immunotherapy. Although there are some data to suggest that objective response rates with nivolumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab, are highest in patients with positive PDL1 expression in NSCLC and melanoma, the absence of this marker is not an indication that patients will fail to respond to treatment [85,86]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, no predictive biomarkers have been validated that can be used to guide patient selection for treatment with immunotherapy. Although there are some data to suggest that objective response rates with nivolumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab, are highest in patients with positive PDL1 expression in NSCLC and melanoma, the absence of this marker is not an indication that patients will fail to respond to treatment [85,86]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the melanoma trial, 37 responses to combined checkpoint blockade were seen with equal frequency in PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors, suggesting that the addition of anti-CTLA-4 may alter factors in the tumor microenvironment, possibly rendering PD-L1-negative tumors more susceptible to anti-PD-1 blockade. 35 A trial comparing clinical activity of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab with standard TKI therapy in advanced RCC has been initiated (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01472081).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Subsequent data suggested that metastatic melanoma patients who lacked PD-L1 expression their tumor could still respond to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibtion, albeit at a lower rate. 26,27,28 While these results showed the utility of PD-L1 staining, this may not yet be useful at the individual patient level since patients with PD-L1 negative tumors can have responses to treatment. Ongoing clinical trials that have collected pre-treatment tumor biopsies will be useful in future assessment of PD-L1 expression and correlations with tumor response.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 94%