Summary:We have compared the efficacy of two PBSC mobilisation regimens, mini-ICE þ filgrastim (second consolidation) and HiDAC þ AMSA þ filgrastim (third consolidation), in two consecutive cohorts of patients with AML CR1 receiving treatment according to a joint protocol. Group A: 18 patients, aged 41 (21-65) years, were mobilised with mini-ICE (idarubicin 8 mg/m 2 þ cytarabine 800 mg/m 2 þ etoposide 150 mg/m 2 days 1-3) followed by filgrastim 300-480 lg once daily s.c. from day 11 after start of chemotherapy. Only four patients reached 45 CD34þ cells/ll blood (B-CD34 þ ) and were able to undergo leukaphereses. Two out of 18 (11%) reached the defined target of X2.0 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. Group B: 20 patients, aged 50 (29-67) years, received HiDAC þ AMSA (cytarabine 3 g/m 2 b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5 þ amsacrine 150 mg/m 2 q.d. days 2, 4) followed by filgrastim at a similar dose starting on day 7. A total of 18 patients reached B-CD34 þ 45/ll and underwent PBSC harvesting, starting on day 23 (14-29) and yielding 4.0 (0.9-21) Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg. Of 20 patients, 17 (85%) reached the defined target of X2.0 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. We conclude that HiDAC þ AMSA þ G-CSF -in contrast to mini-ICE þ G-CSF -is an efficient regimen for mobilising PBSC in patients with AML CR1.