2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03651.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral blood stem cell collection in allogeneic donors: impact of venous access

Abstract: Central femoral lines proved to be safe and tolerable in healthy allogeneic donors but peripheral venous access should be preferred, whenever possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 98 Pain at the site of puncture occurs more frequently in donors with a central (58%) than peripheral vein access (38%). 99 The occurrence of acute side effects in large series of BM and PB HSPC harvests in donors has been compared, which showed that peak levels of pain and toxicities were comparable in both harvesting methods. 100 …”
Section: Pb Hspc Harvesting By Apheresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 98 Pain at the site of puncture occurs more frequently in donors with a central (58%) than peripheral vein access (38%). 99 The occurrence of acute side effects in large series of BM and PB HSPC harvests in donors has been compared, which showed that peak levels of pain and toxicities were comparable in both harvesting methods. 100 …”
Section: Pb Hspc Harvesting By Apheresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the jugular and subclavian veins have advantages in terms of bacterial contamination, but their disadvantage is the risk of pneumothorax or hemothorax and air embolism due to improper catheter manipulation. The femoral vein is often discouraged due to the high incidence of bacterial infection and thrombosis, in addition to the need of the patient to remain in bed during the time in which the use of the catheter is required 20 - 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature on the topic of vascular access for leukapheresis shows an ongoing discussion about whether to use 1) peripheral cannulae, 2) central lines, or 3) a combination of both to perform apheresis with optimal efficacy. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Specifically, for options 2 and 3, the question of using permanent or temporary central venous catheters is still under debate. 11,14,18,19 While most of these studies were performed in adult patients, there are limited data specifically addressing the topic of venous access in pediatric oncology patients.…”
Section: From the 1 Department For Children And Adolescents Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction containing the CD34+ PBSCs is extracted, the blood is returned to the patient via the second venous access (inlet). A review of the literature on the topic of vascular access for leukapheresis shows an ongoing discussion about whether to use 1) peripheral cannulae, 2) central lines, or 3) a combination of both to perform apheresis with optimal efficacy . Specifically, for options 2 and 3, the question of using permanent or temporary central venous catheters is still under debate .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%