2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization from healthy donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the use of corticosteroids in these immunocompromised patients implies an increased susceptibility to infections and graft rejection due to donor T-cell suppression. [20][21][22][23] In the current analysis, the use of peripheral blood grafts was an independent factor predictive for CRS development following haplo-HSCT. Different studies showed similar results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the use of corticosteroids in these immunocompromised patients implies an increased susceptibility to infections and graft rejection due to donor T-cell suppression. [20][21][22][23] In the current analysis, the use of peripheral blood grafts was an independent factor predictive for CRS development following haplo-HSCT. Different studies showed similar results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil engraftment at day +30 was 96% (95% CI, 92-100) achieved in a median of 17 days (range [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and CI of platelet engraftment at day +100 was 94% (95% CI, 90-98) in a median of 29 days (range 15-226). CI of achievement of complete donor chimerism at day +100 was 93% (95% CI, 89.8-100).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be performed using automated or semi automated devices [6]. Patients are generally mobilized after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or with plerixafor, or chemotherapy plus G-CSF [7,8]. For successful mobilization, age, diagnosis, stage of disease, type of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the amount of peripheral CD34?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G-CSF is approved and is widely used for mobilizing autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for the purpose of collection and allogeneic graft. 26,27 Similarly, a combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin was shown to promote a small mobilization of CD341 cells in cancer patients. 28 Thus, attempts were made to model the influence of the SoC therapy, EPO, and/or G-CSF on the CD341 cell production rate or mobilization rate using a time-varying covariate approach (in which the presence of comedication was associated with a proportional shift in the base rate) or using the dosing history in a KPD modeling approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%