2020
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral eye length measurement techniques: a review

Abstract: Along with the rising myopia epidemic is the increasing interest in any ocular parameter that might inform understanding of myopia progression. The relationship between eye length and myopia has long been established but the recent interest in the central and peripheral retina, eye shape, retinal contour, and refractive error development is attracting more clinical and research interest in peripheral eye length measurements. Therefore, peripheral eye length measurements are an important step in the ongoing res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(244 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Previously, only A-scan ultrasound biometers enabled measurements of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and central corneal thickness. Today, other methods are available for the measurement of ocular biometry with better precision than A-scan ultrasound; for background of those methods see the review by Koumbo Mekountchou et al 28 Non-contact optical methods provide highly repeatable measurements, [29][30][31] offering a major advantage when assessing ocular biometry components in childhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Previously, only A-scan ultrasound biometers enabled measurements of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and central corneal thickness. Today, other methods are available for the measurement of ocular biometry with better precision than A-scan ultrasound; for background of those methods see the review by Koumbo Mekountchou et al 28 Non-contact optical methods provide highly repeatable measurements, [29][30][31] offering a major advantage when assessing ocular biometry components in childhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometry has been investigated as part of large cross‐sectional cohort studies in children, 4–7 as well as in longitudinal investigations of children 8–15 . Various methods are currently available (e.g., ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, optical low coherence reflectometry, low coherence interferometry and swept‐source optical coherence tomography; for background on those methods, see the review by Koumbo Mekountchou et al 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Biometry has been investigated as part of large cross-sectional cohort studies in children, [4][5][6][7] as well as in longitudinal investigations of children. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Various methods are currently available (e.g., ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, optical low coherence reflectometry, low coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography; for background on those methods, see the review by Koumbo Mekountchou et al 16 ). Optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) with the Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit, haag-streit.com) has been employed in clinical and research settings for a number of years; for indepth details on the method, see Schmid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retinal peripheral visual signals, which are basically the sum of regions, can contral central refractive development independent of central visual experience. The effectiveness of optical defocus in changing axial elongation depends on retinal defocus degree ( 12 , 13 ). However, there are generally four methods to evaluate eccentric refractive errors ( 14 ): subjective eccentric refraction ( 15 ), wavefront measurements with an aHS sensor ( 16 ), streak retinoscopy ( 17 ), and photo refraction with a power refractor ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%