2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00279-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral motor and sensory nerve conduction studies in normal infants and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nerve conduction studies were performed and recorded in all patients except one (F4 [P1]), following a conventional protocol [16] using surface electrodes and stimulator. Age-appropriate reference values were utilized for interpretation [17-19]. Motor conduction study in the upper limbs was done for the median nerve in 7 and for the ulnar nerve in 2 patients, while it could not be performed in one patient (F1 [P1]), because of the presence of bedsores and contracture deformities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nerve conduction studies were performed and recorded in all patients except one (F4 [P1]), following a conventional protocol [16] using surface electrodes and stimulator. Age-appropriate reference values were utilized for interpretation [17-19]. Motor conduction study in the upper limbs was done for the median nerve in 7 and for the ulnar nerve in 2 patients, while it could not be performed in one patient (F1 [P1]), because of the presence of bedsores and contracture deformities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blink reflex, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) were performed according to standard methods [32]. Normative nerve conduction data in patient IV-1 were taken from CruzMartínez et al [33] and García et al [34].…”
Section: Electrophysiological Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the absolute latencies differ between studies (due to, e.g., different stimulation method, filter settings, vigilance state/anesthesia), the general rule is that until the age of approximately 3–5 years, the sep MN 30 and sef T 30 latency decreases and slightly increases thereafter (e.g., Laget et al, 1976; Lauronen et al, 1997; Boor and Goebel, 2000; Gondo et al, 2001; Bercovici et al, 2008; Doria-Lamba et al, 2009; Pihko et al, 2009). These latency changes reflect the increasing neural conduction velocities following myelination and maturation opposed by physical growth of the body and limbs (Müller et al, 1994; Boor and Goebel, 2000; García et al, 2000). …”
Section: Normal Development Of the Somatosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%