2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-008-0006-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain

Abstract: Electrical stimulation has been used since ancient times to treat painful conditions. Electrotherapy for pain was largely consigned to the realm of quackery until the introduction of the Gate Control Theory by Melzack and Wall in 1965 provided a rationale for direct stimulation of peripheral nerves. Since that time, peripheral nerve stimulation has been applied to the treatment of painful conditions throughout the body, beginning with the major nerves of the extremities and culminating today in precise subcuta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have demonstrated complete block of the heat-induced potentiation of the sural-gastrocnemius reflex, showing no significant difference (p > 0.5) from the baseline case in all five nerves tested. While this is only a preliminary animal study, the results demonstrate an improvement over typical TENS, PNS, and SCS success rates in the literature (21)(22)(23)(24). While this may simply be due to the more straightforward and controlled nature of the study, the improvement over PNS suggests that this effect is not merely due to focusing the stimulation directly on the nerve of interest but may be due to a different mechanism of effect, as suggested by CNS studies (2,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We have demonstrated complete block of the heat-induced potentiation of the sural-gastrocnemius reflex, showing no significant difference (p > 0.5) from the baseline case in all five nerves tested. While this is only a preliminary animal study, the results demonstrate an improvement over typical TENS, PNS, and SCS success rates in the literature (21)(22)(23)(24). While this may simply be due to the more straightforward and controlled nature of the study, the improvement over PNS suggests that this effect is not merely due to focusing the stimulation directly on the nerve of interest but may be due to a different mechanism of effect, as suggested by CNS studies (2,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Massage aimed at influencing the motor, nervous and cardiovascular systems, triggering rest and relaxation throughout the body and breath. In addition, massage also aims to restore venous and lymph flow, stimulates the sensory receptors in the skin and sub skin to reduce the feeling of pain [17][18][19]. Besides, the relaxin hormone serves to relax ligaments in the pelvis for birthing process [8], this hormone also relaxes the ligaments supporting the spine thus triggering pregnancy pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was put forward that electrical stimulation reduces neuropathic pain by activating large diameter A-b fibers (which carry innocuous stimuli), which in turn inhibits small c and A-delta fibers, which carry nociceptive input to the brain. 9 This theory was tested clinically by Wall and Sweet in 1967 by implanting electrodes on the median and ulnar nerve. 10 Since then, many developments have been made in neuromodulation, and peripheral nerve stimulation has been shown to be an effective method of managing chronic neuropathic pain and causalgia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%