Abstract:Introduction: Osteoma is a benign slow-growing osteogenic neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of cancellous and/or cortical bone. Jaw bones are seldom affected. Observation: We observed a rare case of a patient with a peripheral mandibular osteoma, which was surgically removed. Comments: Frequently asymptomatic, a peripheral osteoma looks like a bony swelling that may be sessile or pedunculated. Imaging examinations show a well-circumscribed radio-opaque mass. Symptomatic osteomas must be surgically ex… Show more
“…Surgical resection may be indicated in some cases when the osteoma causes functional or aesthetic discomfort (facial asymmetry and occlusal changes), pain, trismus, traumatic ulcers, or periodontal disorders [6,16]. In addition, the type of approach selected should allow adequate viewing and access for the amount of tissue to be removed, and an optimal aesthetic result [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on size, location, and growth vector, condylar osteomas (like condylar hyperplasia) can generate facial asymmetries, manifested by asymmetric mandibular prognathism and altered occlusion [19]. Condylar osteomas can be classified according to their proliferation pattern in central and peripheral [16]. In general, peripheral osteomas are usually pedicled and respect the shape of the condyle since their proliferation pattern does not imply a condylar replacement, so facial and occlusal changes will depend on the location of the osteoma [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, peripheral osteomas are usually pedicled and respect the shape of the condyle since their proliferation pattern does not imply a condylar replacement, so facial and occlusal changes will depend on the location of the osteoma [20]. As they are generally located in the lateral or medial pole, these alterations will be absent, requiring a more conservative resection [16]. However, central type condylar osteomas generate a replacement of the mandibular condyle, causing an alteration of the condylar anatomy and as a consequence facial and occlusal alterations, requiring a major resection through a condylectomy [15].…”
The etiopathogenesis of the osteomas is unknown, however, various authors have pointed out a possible causal relationship with a history of trauma, chronic infection, excessive muscular activity, and embryogenic or endocrine alterations [3,4].
“…Surgical resection may be indicated in some cases when the osteoma causes functional or aesthetic discomfort (facial asymmetry and occlusal changes), pain, trismus, traumatic ulcers, or periodontal disorders [6,16]. In addition, the type of approach selected should allow adequate viewing and access for the amount of tissue to be removed, and an optimal aesthetic result [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on size, location, and growth vector, condylar osteomas (like condylar hyperplasia) can generate facial asymmetries, manifested by asymmetric mandibular prognathism and altered occlusion [19]. Condylar osteomas can be classified according to their proliferation pattern in central and peripheral [16]. In general, peripheral osteomas are usually pedicled and respect the shape of the condyle since their proliferation pattern does not imply a condylar replacement, so facial and occlusal changes will depend on the location of the osteoma [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, peripheral osteomas are usually pedicled and respect the shape of the condyle since their proliferation pattern does not imply a condylar replacement, so facial and occlusal changes will depend on the location of the osteoma [20]. As they are generally located in the lateral or medial pole, these alterations will be absent, requiring a more conservative resection [16]. However, central type condylar osteomas generate a replacement of the mandibular condyle, causing an alteration of the condylar anatomy and as a consequence facial and occlusal alterations, requiring a major resection through a condylectomy [15].…”
The etiopathogenesis of the osteomas is unknown, however, various authors have pointed out a possible causal relationship with a history of trauma, chronic infection, excessive muscular activity, and embryogenic or endocrine alterations [3,4].
“…Osteomas are benign tumors of slow growing nature consisting of mature bone either cancellous or compact in nature. 1 These are generally painless tumors of chronic nature which rarely cause any discomfort to patient other than aesthetic issues. Osteomas are classified and central, peripheral or extraskeletal types.…”
Osteomas are benign osteogenic lesions that result from the proliferation of mature bone. Three variants are known: central, peripheral, and extra skeletal. The peripheral variant is the most common and it most frequently affects the paranasal sinuses, rarely occurring in the jaws. Mostly peripheral osteomas are of small size and rarely requiring surgical treatment. Multiple osteomas occur in Gardner’s syndrome however isolated lesions are non-syndromic. Neoplastic, inflammatory, developmental and traumatic theories are given as etiologic causes. Here we have described a case of 66-year-old female patient who developed a giant peripheral osteoma in mandibular body region which was managed surgically and no recurrence noticed. Radiological evaluation portrayed a different picture and histopathology confirmed the diagnosis.
“…Osteoma, hyperplastic calcifications, endodontic fillings, broken tooth fragment, or fractured pieces of fillings and instruments are sometimes visualized in extraction sites [4][5][6][7][8]. These foreign bodies may disturb socket healing.…”
Background
Foreign bodies may be a cause of concern in dental implant failure.
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to assess the occurrence and to evaluate the types of radiopacities in dental extraction sites using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and methods
The incidence, location, and types of radiopacities were evaluated in 180 CBCT scans.
Results
Different radiopaque structures could be noted in 84 scans. Foreign bodies and remaining roots were frequently seen. Most of the radiopacities were attributed to remaining endodontic filling in upper and lower jaws in 25 scans in different locations. Remaining roots could be detected in 20 scans. Focal and diffuse radiopaque bony lesions were observed in 16 scans. Tissue response in the form of radiolucency could be seen more with endodontic foreign bodies. Tissue reactions to radiopaque filling remnants were seen in 6.11% of cases.
Conclusions
Foreign body remnants, mostly of endodontic fillings, were frequently seen in CBCT in upper and lower jaws. Evidence of tissue reactions to extraction remnants could be found. Endodontic filling remnants could be seen more in the upper jaw. Thorough examination of implant site for the presence of endodontic foreign body remnants should be stressed. Debridement of the extraction socket should be done carefully in endodontically treated teeth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.