2020
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripheral versus central mechanisms of the cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist AM1710 in a mouse model of neuropathic pain

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study it has been shown that intrathecal delivery of both THC and CBD reduce mechanical and cold allodynia in a nerve injury induced neuropathic pain model. While this is the first study to examine the spinal anti-allodynic actions of the phytocannabinoids THC and CBD, these anti-allodynic actions are consistent with those previously reported for synthetic cannabinoid receptors agonists and dihydroxyl phytocannabinoid analogues in a range of neuropathic pain models [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study it has been shown that intrathecal delivery of both THC and CBD reduce mechanical and cold allodynia in a nerve injury induced neuropathic pain model. While this is the first study to examine the spinal anti-allodynic actions of the phytocannabinoids THC and CBD, these anti-allodynic actions are consistent with those previously reported for synthetic cannabinoid receptors agonists and dihydroxyl phytocannabinoid analogues in a range of neuropathic pain models [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Another approach to lessening the side-effects associated with cannabinoids is to use site-directed drug delivery. Several studies have demonstrated that intrathecal delivery of synthetic cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists reduces allodynia in a range of neuropathic pain models of nerve injury, chemotherapeutic drugs, diabetes and cancer [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Surprisingly, relatively little is known about the intrathecal effects of the cannabis constituents, THC and CBD, in neuropathic pain models [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCP-1 was decreased at 30 minutes within the dorsal horn of the spinal cord after i.p injection of AM1710 in the CCI model, indicating it is an early modulator in the mechanisms of reversal of neuropathic pain. 94 The increase in the TNF-α mRNA level observed here in the lumbar spinal cord after intraplantar AM1710 compared with vehicle treatment was unexpected and may reflect compensatory changes. More work is needed to better understand the role of TNF-α in the antiallodynic effects by CB 2 agonists and how CB 2 agonists impact the time course of changes in cytokines and chemokines during the development and maintenance of CIPN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…11 Antiallodynic effects of AM1710 cannot be attributed to CB 1 mechanisms. 21,73,77,94 Third, local hind paw injection of AM1710 reversed paclitaxel-induced allodynia in CB 2 EGFP but not CB 2 KO mice without producing antinociception in cremophor vehicle–treated mice. Intraplantar AM1710 was unlikely to act systemically (or in the CNS) as unilateral hind paw injection did not alter responsiveness of the hypersensitive paw contralateral to AM1710 injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contralateral changes may develop after unilateral CCI of the sciatic nerve, including spontaneous pain and mechanical hypersensitivity in hind paws (Paulson et al, 2002; Wilkerson et al, 2020), as well as gene expression in the spinal cord and DRGs (Jancalek et al, 2010). Because transcriptional changes in contralateral DRGs may differ from those on the ipsilateral side, we performed bilateral sciatic CCI to allow pooling of bilateral DRG tissues for sequencing and to avoid sample variations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%