2018
DOI: 10.1515/esrp-2017-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peripherialisation as a Result and Driving Force of Territorial Mobility in Post-Socialist Romania

Abstract: Over the past two and a half decades, the transition from a centralised to a market economy has affected Romania’s spatial configuration by re-widening the gap between cores and peripheries at a regional scale. Through a statistical analysis carried out for the North-West Region (NUTS 2), my contribution focuses on one of the mechanisms interrelated with peripheralisation, namely territorial mobility. The aim is twofold. First, to show how increasing core-periphery disparities impact mobility flows by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uneven appropriation and use of city resources reinforces the process of revising the boundaries of the core and the periphery. A. Moldovan considers territorial mobility as the main mechanism of this processes that shows, on the one hand, how increasing imbalances between cores and periphery affect mobility flows, offering different levels of structural advantages, and on the other hand, how different social groups can influence these advantages, choosing a place to study, to live and to work [16].…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uneven appropriation and use of city resources reinforces the process of revising the boundaries of the core and the periphery. A. Moldovan considers territorial mobility as the main mechanism of this processes that shows, on the one hand, how increasing imbalances between cores and periphery affect mobility flows, offering different levels of structural advantages, and on the other hand, how different social groups can influence these advantages, choosing a place to study, to live and to work [16].…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%