2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00468.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periprocedural Management and In‐Hospital Outcome of Patients with Indication for Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting

Abstract: A limited, albeit clinically relevant, proportion of patients undergoing PCI-S has indication for OAC. Procedural management appears not substantially different from that of common patients. In-hospital major bleeding is relevant and should be taken into account when evaluating the overall hemorrhagic rate at a medium- to long-term follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Despite overlap in the occurrence of these syndromes, the pharmacotherapies used to manage AF and ACS differ. The management of AF patients who undergo stent placement for an ACS is challenging in so far as the risks of AF-related ischemic stroke and bleeding associated with the antithrombotic therapy and stent thrombosis must all be balanced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Despite overlap in the occurrence of these syndromes, the pharmacotherapies used to manage AF and ACS differ. The management of AF patients who undergo stent placement for an ACS is challenging in so far as the risks of AF-related ischemic stroke and bleeding associated with the antithrombotic therapy and stent thrombosis must all be balanced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that about 5% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has atrial fibrillation or other indications for chronic oral anticoagulant therapy [5]. Since DAPT provides insufficient protection against stroke and thrombotic complications in patients with AF and mechanical aortic valves [6,7], substitution of OAC with DAPT appears not applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 It is estimated that 5-7% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have AF or other indications for chronic oral anticoagulant therapy. [3][4][5] These patients pose a significant dilemma for the interventional cardiologist because the combination of oral anticoagulants with aspirin and clopidogrel ("triple therapy") during follow-up has been reported to result in an increase risk of major bleeding. 6 Major bleeding is a serious complication that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality particularly when it occurs shortly after a stent procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%