2017
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b1.bjj-2016-0220.r1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them

Abstract: Very few studies within the PFF literature provide detailed implant information. Cementless implants, specifically those of single-wedge and double-wedge, have the highest PFF rates in the literature, with most investigations recommending against their use in older patients with osteoporotic bone. This review illustrates the need for registries and future PFF studies to record implant name and information for future analysis. Furthermore, future biomechanical investigations comparing modern implants are needed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to study only young and middle‐aged patients without osteoporosis, in whom uncemented THA is the method of choice . The increased risk for periprosthetic fractures for uncemented femoral implants in elderly females and osteoporotic patients is one argument to restrict uncemented implants to the younger subset of patients suitable for THA . From a Swedish perspective, uncemented THA in the elderly is an uncommon procedure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose to study only young and middle‐aged patients without osteoporosis, in whom uncemented THA is the method of choice . The increased risk for periprosthetic fractures for uncemented femoral implants in elderly females and osteoporotic patients is one argument to restrict uncemented implants to the younger subset of patients suitable for THA . From a Swedish perspective, uncemented THA in the elderly is an uncommon procedure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) The increased risk for periprosthetic fractures for uncemented femoral implants in elderly females and osteoporotic patients is one argument to restrict uncemented implants to the younger subset of patients suitable for THA. (29) From a Swedish perspective, uncemented THA in the elderly is an uncommon procedure. (4) In addition, previous reports and RCTs on periprosthetic BMD have often been based on younger and middle-aged patients without osteoporosis and for uncemented THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With cementless implants, there are subdivisions by shape of the femoral component. A systematic review by Carli et al showed that two subtypes of implant (single-and doublewedge) have increased rates of PFF, suggesting the geometry of the implant is a factor, in addition to the method of insertion [38]. Regarding cemented implants, polished tapered stems, which are designed to wedge in a cement mantle in the proximal femur, were associated with a greater incidence of PFF than others.…”
Section: Surgery-related Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was probably related to the trapezoidal shape of the implant, which sometimes may not be suitable for all proximal femoral morphologies. In this scenario, more anatomic, rounded stems may be useful to prevent PPFs when compared to single-or double-wedge components [19]. Abdel et al [20] reported a 7.7% and 3.5% risk for postoperative PFF after cementless and cemented THA, respectively, at 20 years of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%