2004
DOI: 10.1245/aso.2004.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peritonectomy and Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion (IPHP): A Strategy That Has Confirmed its Efficacy in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Abstract: CRS associated with IPHP permitted complete tumor removal with an acceptable morbidity and mortality for patients with PMP. This study confirms the efficacy of the combined treatment in terms of long-term survival and local disease control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
73
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In other published series recurrence or progression rates of 40-70% have been reported. 6,7,15 As in other series, we observed that pathological subtype and result of initial cytoreduction were the dominant factors related to progression. 3,10,17 The diagnosis of progressive disease is not always easy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other published series recurrence or progression rates of 40-70% have been reported. 6,7,15 As in other series, we observed that pathological subtype and result of initial cytoreduction were the dominant factors related to progression. 3,10,17 The diagnosis of progressive disease is not always easy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A number of series using this approach has now been published, showing indeed that longterm disease free and progression free survival can be improved. [3][4][5][6]15,16 Still, even after this combined modality treatment progression was observed in our series in 41% of cases. In other published series recurrence or progression rates of 40-70% have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies show 5-year overall survival rates that are improved with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, when compared to cytoreductive surgery alone, 53-100% versus 53-75%, respectively [7,9,15,17,19,[21][22][23][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Despite these results, there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing cytoreductive surgery and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in patients with low-grade appendiceal neoplasms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies suggest improved survival in those with low-grade disease, but whether or not the addition of HIPEC also plays a role is difficult to know without randomized control trials. Although we see a potential benefit with the use of HIPEC in selected patients, the risks and benefits of using this need to be adjusted for Deraco et al conducted a phase II study by evaluating cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC using Mitomycin-C and Cisplatin [22]. They had 33 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei, the majority of which had DPAM.…”
Section: Journal Of Gastrointestinal and Digestive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%