2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00221-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PERMACLIM: a model for the distribution of mountain permafrost, based on climatic observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all these models, the permafrost probability increases upslope (e.g. Hoelzle et al, 2001;Guglielmin et al, 2003;Riseborough et al, 2008), which is in contradiction to the data shown here.…”
Section: Permafrost Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In all these models, the permafrost probability increases upslope (e.g. Hoelzle et al, 2001;Guglielmin et al, 2003;Riseborough et al, 2008), which is in contradiction to the data shown here.…”
Section: Permafrost Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Stocker et al (2002) developed PERMEBAL, which simulates snow cover persistence and ground temperatures of snow-free points based on meteorological and site-specific data. Guglielmin et al (2003) designed the PERMACLIM model that calculates ground temperatures for DEM points by including data from a climatic database and snow thermal characteristics. A variety of models have been created; however, discrepancies still exist as to which model is the most useful and effective for accurately representing the distribution of permafrost Lugon and Delaloye, 2001).…”
Section: Gis Modeling Of Alpine Permafrostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permafrost mapping and modeling has been initiated in major mountain regions of the world (Keller, 1992;Hoelzle et al, 1993;Imhof, 1996;Frauenfelder et al, 1998;Etzelmüller et al, 2001;Gruber and Hoelzle, 2001;Lugon and Delaloye, 2001;Tannarro et al, 2001;Heginbottom, 2002;Guglielmin et al, 2003;Frauenfelder et al, 2003). In the Front Range (Figure 1), however, there is little precise information about permafrost distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%