1999
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199901000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent Anatomic Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus in Newborn Baboons: The Roles of Postnatal Constriction, Hypoxia, and Gestation

Abstract: Permanent closure of the ductus arteriosus requires loss of cells from the muscle media and development of neointimal mounds, composed in part of proliferating endothelial cells. We hypothesized that postnatal ductus constriction produces hypoxia of the inner vessel wall; we also hypothesized that hypoxia might lead to cell death and the production of vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), a hypoxia-inducible growth factor that stimulates endothelial proliferation. We mapped the distribution of hypoxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
173
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the constriction, the inner muscle wall of the ductus arteriosus develops profound ischemic hypoxia which leads to the formation of vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factorbeta, and other inflammatory mediators and growth factors that transform the ductus into a non-contractile ligament. 3 Conversely, in preterm infants, the ductus often fails to constrict in the days following birth. Even in those preterm infants who achieve ductus constriction, the ductus frequently fails to develop the level of profound hypoxic ischemia needed to cause remodeling of the artery.…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the constriction, the inner muscle wall of the ductus arteriosus develops profound ischemic hypoxia which leads to the formation of vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factorbeta, and other inflammatory mediators and growth factors that transform the ductus into a non-contractile ligament. 3 Conversely, in preterm infants, the ductus often fails to constrict in the days following birth. Even in those preterm infants who achieve ductus constriction, the ductus frequently fails to develop the level of profound hypoxic ischemia needed to cause remodeling of the artery.…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this occurs, the center of the ductus wall becomes profoundly ischemic. 3 In the premature (24 week gestation) ductus, the vessel wall is only about 200 mm in thickness (Figure 2). The scattered vasa vasorum in the vessel lie in the adventitia and do not penetrate the muscle media.…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4] The physiological mechanism involved in this process are now beginning to be understood. 1,24,25 The presence of sPDA in our study represents a combination of failure of the ductus to close and the reopening of a previously closed ductus. Postnatally, many factors are known to influence the temporary or permanent closure of a ductus arteriosus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1,14,17 It is possible that in some preterm infants, whether spontaneously or indomethacin mediated, the ductus arteriosus frequently fails to develop the level of profound ischemia needed to cause remodeling, thus allowing the vessel to remain open, or if it is already closed, to reopen. 1,17,18 Satisfactory clinical responses to postnatal indomethacin treatment for sPDA are expected to be about 50% for infants at 24 to 25 weeks of GA and 60% or higher for those ELBW infants of older GA. 3,19 In the present study, successful indomethacin treatment of sPDA was noted in 38% of indomethacin prophylaxis infants and in 59% of those managed expectantly. It is possible that indomethacin prophylaxis, although failing to prevent an sPDA, may have preselected a group of infants that having failed once are predisposed to fail a second indomethacin treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%