Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Permanent surface and downhole measurement technologies have advanced considerably in terms of availability, reliability, performance and costs, and are increasingly deployed for real-time monitoring of wells and equipment. Permanent downhole sensors are used to measure pressure, temperature, flow rates, fluid phases and to reflect operating conditions in wellbores. Surface sensor systems provide real-time measurements of pressure, temperature, fluid phases and flow rates that need to be integrated for analysis. The resulting large volume of data has created challenges in data management, evaluation and analysis. It is important that production analysts have access to workflows and tools that provide real-time efficient and effective visualization and analysis. The optimal approach is to perform the visualization and analysis of data in real time, or near real time, to provide analysts with actionable information for timely and accurate decision making. Permanent downhole gauges are used for monitoring reservoir drainage, injection efficiency, well-completion hardware performance, and downhole pump performance. Some of the resulting benefits include reduced operational costs, improved safety, and properly monitored well integrity. Several onshore and offshore case studies are discussed to demonstrate application of real-time measurements coupled with visualization and analysis techniques to also achieve improved artificial lift performance, reduced operating costs, and manage production. The value of the information obtained from downhole permanent gauges and surface measurements are justified as evidenced by the growing number of operators relying on real-time permanent gauges. This paper reviews technologies that are used to monitor and manage equipment and production in oil and gas wells. It explains that the realized value of permanent monitoring depends on an efficient workflow for collection, evaluation, and analysis.
Permanent surface and downhole measurement technologies have advanced considerably in terms of availability, reliability, performance and costs, and are increasingly deployed for real-time monitoring of wells and equipment. Permanent downhole sensors are used to measure pressure, temperature, flow rates, fluid phases and to reflect operating conditions in wellbores. Surface sensor systems provide real-time measurements of pressure, temperature, fluid phases and flow rates that need to be integrated for analysis. The resulting large volume of data has created challenges in data management, evaluation and analysis. It is important that production analysts have access to workflows and tools that provide real-time efficient and effective visualization and analysis. The optimal approach is to perform the visualization and analysis of data in real time, or near real time, to provide analysts with actionable information for timely and accurate decision making. Permanent downhole gauges are used for monitoring reservoir drainage, injection efficiency, well-completion hardware performance, and downhole pump performance. Some of the resulting benefits include reduced operational costs, improved safety, and properly monitored well integrity. Several onshore and offshore case studies are discussed to demonstrate application of real-time measurements coupled with visualization and analysis techniques to also achieve improved artificial lift performance, reduced operating costs, and manage production. The value of the information obtained from downhole permanent gauges and surface measurements are justified as evidenced by the growing number of operators relying on real-time permanent gauges. This paper reviews technologies that are used to monitor and manage equipment and production in oil and gas wells. It explains that the realized value of permanent monitoring depends on an efficient workflow for collection, evaluation, and analysis.
Downhole flow meters are needed in oil field applications to measure the amount of fluid produced from a well. One of their advantages over surface flow meters is measurement of in situ pressure and temperature, which provides additional wellbore information to reservoir and production engineers. This work involves performing uncertainty analysis on a downhole flow meter tested for use in oil field operations. It is an important step to determine acceptable measurement limits of the metering system. To quantify the measurement uncertainty, the analysis was performed on a downhole, oil-water flow meter with an inlet pipe diameter of 0.076 m. The analysis covered differential pressures with corresponding flow rates from 0.0036 m3/s up to the maximum flow meter capacity of 0.0224 m3/s. The operating fluid temperatures varied from 32°C to 40°C, which consequently changed the oil and water densities and kinematic viscosities during the flow meter tests. For a given operating flow rate and temperature, the uncertainty in the individual measurement components of the meter were determined, and the overall metering system uncertainty established. The results indicate that as the operating flow rate increased, the uncertainty in the flow rate reduced substantially. The increase in temperature had the effect of increasing the magnitude of the flow rate measured by the flow meter. The variation in the flow meter inlet pipe diameter introduced the largest uncertainty in the flow meter measurement. The uncertainty was in the order of a factor of two and higher compared to the next lower uncertainty contributor. These observations suggest the importance of ensuring accurate control of flow meter geometry and flow parameters, to ensure reliable measurements of fluid flow from the wellbore. Installing downhole flow meters in oil field applications is an important step in gaining additional knowledge of reservoir conditions at the flow measurement location. It is vital to ensure that measurements obtained from these flow meters are accurate in field operations for good production decision making. This paper highlights the flow meter parameters contributing to its uncertainty and also provides recommendations to maintain its reliability in the field.
Throughout the last years, considerable efforts have been made to increase the quality of reservoir monitoring, as to improve managing and predictability. The quality improvement in reservoir management achieved with the acquisition of bottomhole data through the use of permanent downhole gauges, PDGs, is so remarkable[1],[2] that today the requisite of PDG installation, mainly in wet x-mas tree completions, is nearly out of question[3] either for oil or gas producers or for water or gas injectors. Unfortunately, corresponding progress has not been attained with respect to the individualized flow measurement per well[4], or better yet, per completion interval in a single well, despite the recent advances in technology available to this effect[5],[6]. This paper presents results obtained through measurement of downhole flow rate and its correction to surface conditions from a well under commingled production zone. Earlier, Puntel [7] presented a first case in Portuguese considering one completion zone with a well that has, between the completion equipments, two PDG Mandrels, one of them measuring pressure between string and casing; the other measuring the pressure within the production string. These PDGs are located almost at the same vertical depth, but are related to different flow areas, so that the pressure difference recorded between them can also be used to calculate the total flow rate. Furthermore, another typical installation provides access to two or more completed zones, allowing individual annular pressure measurements. This completion scheme also provides ICV[8],[9] control, turning it possible to calculate individual zone contributions through almost the same methodology adopted to the one zone base case. The flow rate is obtained by means of the Bernoulli equation[10], assuming measurement of differential pressure between two flow sections with different cross sectional areas or otherwise, the Darcy-Weisbach equation[11], referring to the pressure loss through long pipes with same cross sectional area. Thermodinamic functions as well as a simple calibration procedure provide volumetric flow rate correction from bottomhole to surface pressure and temperature conditions. Deviation from ideal behavior can indicate change in flow regime or, for instance, scale buildup[12] inside production tubing. Those techniques are feasible with high precision for single-phase liquid flow, a condition observed more frequently at bottomhole conditions. Field examples are provided to illustrate all presented cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.