2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent fluid–structure interaction with non-conforming interfaces in fast transient dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the fragments do not perforate the plate or the blast wave reaches the plate before or simultaneously as the fragments, the total load will be equal to the sum of the contributions from the blast wave and the fragment impact [28]. The diaphragm is melted along its circumference, and the nozzle outlet is open so that 12 PP  . III: A net load is created on the test specimen because the pressurized air evacuates quicker through the nozzle outlet than through the holes in the test specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the fragments do not perforate the plate or the blast wave reaches the plate before or simultaneously as the fragments, the total load will be equal to the sum of the contributions from the blast wave and the fragment impact [28]. The diaphragm is melted along its circumference, and the nozzle outlet is open so that 12 PP  . III: A net load is created on the test specimen because the pressurized air evacuates quicker through the nozzle outlet than through the holes in the test specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] and [11]). Casadei and Potapov [12] published a review of various FSI algorithms for (Arbitrary) LagrangianEulerian analyses. Methods like these allow for analysis of confined explosions in arbitrary geometries such as train carriages inside tunnels [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, in non-conforming mesh methods the interface and the related conditions are treated as constraints imposed on the model equations so that the fluid and solid equations can be solved independently from each other with their respective grids [21]. This represents an important advantage because, typically, the mesh used for the fluid has an average size lower than the one used for the solid and so it is not necessary to refine the solid finite element grid near to the interface.…”
Section: Algorithms For Fsi Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It works with conforming as well as non-conforming [33] fluid-structure meshes. According to the FSA algorithm (and restricting ourselves to the conforming case for simplicity), any fluid node F on the F-S interface (see Fig.…”
Section: Ale Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%