2019
DOI: 10.3390/mca24030067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent-Magnet Eddy-Current Losses: A Global Revision of Calculation and Analysis

Abstract: Eddy-current analysis is an important research field. This phenomenon occurs in multiple areas and has several applications: electromagnetic braking, repulsive effects, levitation, etc. Thereby, this paper is limited to eddy-current study in rotating electrical machines. In the design process, if the permanent-magnet (PM) loss calculation is very important, the overheating due to eddy-currents must be taken into account. The content of this paper includes sources, calculation methods, reduction techniques, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining the bar chart presented in Figure 15, we may observe that over (nearly) the entire operational range, PM power losses are smaller in Motor #2; the difference is increased as rotational speed rises (this is true with exception of operating points at speed n = 1500 rpm and at loads up to T m = 150 Nm). Publications on the subject make it evident that decrease in number of slots per pole per phase results in increased PM losses [47]. Still, it must be pointed out that Motor #2 differs from Motor #1 by the number of magnetic pole pairs positioned upon diameter of similar size; this is related to significant decrease in PM angular length, so, finally, PM losses are lessened.…”
Section: Discussion Calculation Results-comparison Of Operational Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the bar chart presented in Figure 15, we may observe that over (nearly) the entire operational range, PM power losses are smaller in Motor #2; the difference is increased as rotational speed rises (this is true with exception of operating points at speed n = 1500 rpm and at loads up to T m = 150 Nm). Publications on the subject make it evident that decrease in number of slots per pole per phase results in increased PM losses [47]. Still, it must be pointed out that Motor #2 differs from Motor #1 by the number of magnetic pole pairs positioned upon diameter of similar size; this is related to significant decrease in PM angular length, so, finally, PM losses are lessened.…”
Section: Discussion Calculation Results-comparison Of Operational Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface charge density gradients generate gradients of electric field, and using square root scaled chart [64], it can be graphically evaluated for a conducting strip [65] and a bottleneck shaped sloppy conducting strip [66]. If reaction field is taken into consideration, the diffusion effect can be evaluated using MF method [40].…”
Section: Retaining Sleeve Winding and Eddy-current Reaction Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For source terms, the assumption of balanced stator currents under steady-state operation are used to evaluate eddy-current reaction field. The balanced condition is not method-wise but needs to manipulate the diffusion equation into the Helmholtz equation form [11,39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PM machines, the rotor losses are caused by a permeance variation of the airgap due to the slotting of the stator. When pulse width modulation (PWM) inverters are used for the excitation of PM machines, eddy current losses are produced by the switching harmonics of the PWM inverter [7], [8]. Hence, it is essential to diminish the spatial and time harmonics of the machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%