2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Cardiac Surgery: Indications and Long‐Term Follow‐Up

Abstract: (PACE 2009; 32:7-12) permanent pacemaker, cardiac surgery IntroductionThe incidence of conduction disturbance requiring pacing after open heart operations is between 10% and 15%. [1][2][3][4] Most of these will recover, however, 1-3% of patients will require permanent pacemaker implantation. [5][6][7] We reviewed our experience with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following cardiac surgery. Our aim was to identify predictors for PPM requirement and identify patients who will remain pacemaker dependen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
82
8
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
17
82
8
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of disorders of atrioventricular (AV) in the post-cardiac surgery (POCS) valve is located, according to the literature, 10 to 15% [1]. Most patients have disturbances of a temporary nature and will require temporary cardiac pacing (DPM), but 1% to 3% of patients, given the irreversibility of the framework, will be subject to a definitive pacemaker (DPM) during hospitalization [1][2][3]. In this study, we analyzed the experience of more than 1100 valve surgery procedures in order to verify the relationship between factors pre-, intra-and postoperative (perioperative) associated with atrioventricular block (AVB) and the need for TAC with later implant DPM on POCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of disorders of atrioventricular (AV) in the post-cardiac surgery (POCS) valve is located, according to the literature, 10 to 15% [1]. Most patients have disturbances of a temporary nature and will require temporary cardiac pacing (DPM), but 1% to 3% of patients, given the irreversibility of the framework, will be subject to a definitive pacemaker (DPM) during hospitalization [1][2][3]. In this study, we analyzed the experience of more than 1100 valve surgery procedures in order to verify the relationship between factors pre-, intra-and postoperative (perioperative) associated with atrioventricular block (AVB) and the need for TAC with later implant DPM on POCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the mechanical ventilation parameters, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) contributes to improved oxygenation and prevention of atelectasis, maintains positive pressure in the airway, promotes recruitment and stabilization of alveoli and small airways and reduces pulmonary shunting and increases functional residual capacity, avoiding alveolar collapse. 3,[9][10][11][12][13] We compared the effects of different levels of PEEP on mechanical ventilation duration after coronary artery bypass to identify parameters that could indicate early withdrawal of mechanical ventilation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, a new conduction defects could be reversible (58). Development of a new conduction defects resulted to an increased need for monitoring and hence a longer hospital stay (60) The main predictor for permanent pace maker implantation in other series were preoperative conduction defects (58,(61)(62)(63). Other predictors were female gender, annular calcification, bicuspid aortic valve, hypertension, myocardial infarction, electrolyte imbalance and prolonged cross-clamping time (60,64,65).…”
Section: Conduction Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%