1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8941-3_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent Superhumps in Nova V1974 Cygni 1992

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…during 1995 and 1996, as well as other features of the optical LC of the nova discussed in Retter et al (1997), argue against the magnetic interpretation for the longer period, and for the PSH one, which we adopt in this letter.…”
Section: Superhumps In Classical Nova Systemsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…during 1995 and 1996, as well as other features of the optical LC of the nova discussed in Retter et al (1997), argue against the magnetic interpretation for the longer period, and for the PSH one, which we adopt in this letter.…”
Section: Superhumps In Classical Nova Systemsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Photometric observations of V1974 Cyg (N. Cyg 1992) revealed two periodic oscillations in the LC of the star (Retter, Ofek & Leibowitz 1995). While there is an overall agreement that the shorter is the orbital period of the binary system, two interpretations for the nature of the second period, which is about 5% larger than the orbital one, have been suggested.…”
Section: Superhumps In Classical Nova Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patterson et al (1995) observed the superhumps in the SU UMa system V1159 Orionis to persist well after superoutburst had ended. Modulations tentatively identified as superhumps have also been observed in several other short period cataclysmic variables (see Patterson & Richman 1991, Retter, Leibowitz & Ofek 1997) that don't exhibit classic dwarf novae activity.…”
Section: Superhumpsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The two periods obey exactly the relation that holds between the orbital and superhump periods in the SU UMa members. (Stolz & Schoembs 1981, 1984Retter et al 1995, Retter, Leibowitz & Ofek 1996 3. We establish the coherence of the shorter periodicity, and hence the likelihood that it is the orbital period of the binary system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%