2018
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability function for oil sands tailings undergoing volume change during drying

Abstract: The coefficient of permeability function is an important unsaturated soil property required when modeling seepage and contaminant transport phenomena. Inaccuracies in the estimation of the permeability function can lead to significant errors in numerical modeling results. Changes in void ratio and degree of saturation are factors that influence the permeability function. Presently available methodologies for estimating the unsaturated permeability function make the assumption that there is no volume change as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been highlighted earlier that the AEV determined from θ−SWCC, w-SWCC and S-SWCC are different for soils with volume change. The correct AEV is given by S-SWCC and this AEV should be used as the upper bound of the lower limit of integration (sL) when determining the permeability function from either θ−SWCC or w-SWCC (Wijaya and Leong, 2018). If S-SWCC is used, the difference in kr if sL values from less than AEV to AEV is only about 0.5 order in magnitude (Wijaya and Leong, 2018) as illustrated for oil tailing sands in Fig.…”
Section: Estimation Of Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been highlighted earlier that the AEV determined from θ−SWCC, w-SWCC and S-SWCC are different for soils with volume change. The correct AEV is given by S-SWCC and this AEV should be used as the upper bound of the lower limit of integration (sL) when determining the permeability function from either θ−SWCC or w-SWCC (Wijaya and Leong, 2018). If S-SWCC is used, the difference in kr if sL values from less than AEV to AEV is only about 0.5 order in magnitude (Wijaya and Leong, 2018) as illustrated for oil tailing sands in Fig.…”
Section: Estimation Of Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, change in the volume of bentonite, due to the change in water content, will lead to a change in the permeability of the bentonite [3][4][5]. Thus, it is necessary to construct shrinkage curve to understand the relationship between water content with void ratio of the bentonite [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(v) A number of SWCC equations for unimodal SWCC have been evaluated by Leong and Rahardjo (1997a). Several bimodal SWCC equations have been proposed (Zhang and Chen, 2005;Carducci et al, 2011;Satyanaga et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014;and Wijaya and Leong, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017). Compared to the unimodal SWCC equations, bimodal SWCC equations have more unknown parameters.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the parameters of ZC and CA on the bimodal SWCC are similar as the effects of the parameters on and van Genuchten (1980) unimodal SWCC equations, respectively. The ZC equation parameters pl, and npl, ps and nps can be combined together as θl and θs (Zhang et al, 2017), respectively, and θs+ θl= θsat, where θsat is assumed known. Hence, the number of unknown parameters in the ZC equation can be reduced from 12 to 9 and the ZC equation can be rewritten as Equation 7.1 .…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%