“…Studies of fossil dasycladaleans focus mainly on their morphology and taxonomy at the genus and species level (Johnson, 1961a; Pia, 1926), on their palaeoecology, biostratigraphic application, and palaeoenvironmental significance (Barattolo, 1991; Bucur, 1999; Granier & Deloffre, 1993; Johnson, 1961b). Considerable researches focusing on the depositional environments of the dasycladaleans in the Late Palaeozoic (Flügel, 1977; Ghaderi, Abad, Ashouri, & Korn, 2016; Kirkland & Chapman, 1990; Krainer, 1995; Krainer, Flügel, Vachard, & Joachimski, 2003; Samankassou, 1999), Mesozoic (Abate, Catalano, D'Argenio, Di Stefano, & Riccobono, 1977; Barattolo & Bigozzi, 1996; Bucur, Rashidi, & Senowbari‐Daryan, 2012; Bucur & Sasaran, 2005, 2012; Bucur, Schlagintweit, Rashidi, & Saberzadeh, 2016; Flügel, 1979; Henrich, 1984; Jamalian et al, 2011; Mircescu, Bucur, & Sasaran, 2014; Morin, Desrochers, & Beauchamp, 1994; Ruffer & Zamparelli, 1997; Senowbari‐Daryan, Zuhlke, Bechstadt, & Flugel, 1993), Cenozoic successions (Hanif et al, 2014; Humane, Chaurpagar, Humane, & Kundal, 2010; Kundal & Kundal, 2010), as well as in the present‐day (Ohba, Matsuda, Asami, & Iryu, 2017) have been performed, revealing that dasycladaleans were mainly distributed in lagoonal environments (Abate et al, 1977; Barattolo & Bigozzi, 1996; Flügel, 1979; Hanif et al, 2014; Humane et al, 2010; Jamalian et al, 2011; Ruffer & Zamparelli, 1997), with a lesser representation in platform margins (Bucur & Sasaran, 2012; Mircescu et al, 2014), reefs (Bao, Jiang, Wu, Ren, & Liu, 2016; Bucur & Sasaran, 2012; Ohba et al, 2017), and open platforms (Flügel, 1977).…”