1991
DOI: 10.1016/0034-6667(91)90046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permian palynostratigraphy of the Collie Basin, Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
71
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
71
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There are however some difficulties in correlating the zonation scheme established here with that of Backhouse (1991) for the Collie Basin. The most important limitation is due to the fact that between the two areas certain key species reveal variable ranges and abundances, an observation also recognized by Backhouse (1991) when comparing the assemblages from the Collie Basin with other Australian basins. Due to the difficulties outlined above, only a broad correlation (Fig.…”
Section: Australiamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are however some difficulties in correlating the zonation scheme established here with that of Backhouse (1991) for the Collie Basin. The most important limitation is due to the fact that between the two areas certain key species reveal variable ranges and abundances, an observation also recognized by Backhouse (1991) when comparing the assemblages from the Collie Basin with other Australian basins. Due to the difficulties outlined above, only a broad correlation (Fig.…”
Section: Australiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Correlation with the zonation scheme of Backhouse (1991). -Backhouse (1991) established the most widely compared palynostratigraphic scheme from the Gondwana Permian sequences of the Collie Basin of Australia.…”
Section: Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4) no presentan elementos diagnósticos que permitan referirlas a algunas de la biozonas conocidas para el centro-oeste de Argentina (Césari y Gutiérrez, 2001;Gutiérrez et al, 2003). Entre sus componentes se destaca la asociación de Barakarites rotatus, Protohaploxypinus bharadwaji, Anapiculatisporites teretangulus, Horriditriletes ramosus y Converrucosisporites confluens, cuyos registros se encuentran hasta el momento entre el Pennsylvaniano y el Guadalupiano (Tabla 5), siendo comunes en el Pérmico de Australia, India, Antártica, África (véase Foster, 1979;Playford, 1990;Backhouse, 1991), Brasil, Uruguay y Argentina (véase Césari et al, 1995;Quadros et al, 1996;Playford y Dino, 2000Souza y Calegari, 2004;Beri et al, 2006;Gutiérrez et al, 2006;Smaniotto et al, 2006;Vergel, 2008;di Pasquo et al, 2010 (Césari y Gutiérrez, 2001;Césari, 2007;Gutiérrez et al, 2008 (Césari, 2007;Gutiérrez et al, 2008), siendo parcialmente equivalente a las biozonas Striatites (Cuenca Chacoparaná en Argentina; Russo et al, 1980) y Lueckisporites virkkiae (Cuenca Paraná en Brasil; Souza y Marques Toigo, 2005).…”
Section: Edadunclassified