2005
DOI: 10.1007/11574781_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permission and Authorization in Policies for Virtual Communities of Agents

Abstract: Abstract. We study the design of policies for virtual communities of agents based on peer-to-peer systems or the grid infrastructure. In a virtual community agents can play both the role of resource consumers and the role of resource providers. Moreover, the agents remain in control of their resources, and therefore we distinguish between the authorization to access a resource given by the virtual community and the permission to do so issued by the resource providers. We propose a logical multiagent framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the policy of a virtual community may have a distributed character and can be seen as a product of the policies of the community members. Boella and van der Torre [3] take the same direction and emphasise the distinction between authorisations given by the Community Authorisation Service and permissions granted by resource providers in virtual communities of agents. They regard authorisation as a means used by community authorities to regulate the access of customers to resources that are not under control of these authorities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the policy of a virtual community may have a distributed character and can be seen as a product of the policies of the community members. Boella and van der Torre [3] take the same direction and emphasise the distinction between authorisations given by the Community Authorisation Service and permissions granted by resource providers in virtual communities of agents. They regard authorisation as a means used by community authorities to regulate the access of customers to resources that are not under control of these authorities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the current framework can be extended to deal not only with policies consisting of regulative rules like obligations, prohibitions, and permissions, but also with constitutive rules specifying counts-as relations and institutional facts [39]. In particular, in [38], we use countsas relations to specify local policies concerning authorizations, while global policies prescribing constitutive rules are still an open issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in [38], we explore the problem of how local providers can delegate to other agents the power to authorize access without giving up their autonomy. We argue that the problem can be solved by means of counts-as relations [39]: An agent empowered to authorize can issue declarations that are considered as authorizations by the local provider.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The policies can specify the authorized actions considering the current state of roles and conditions, while determining the next state. Boella and van der Torre (2004) distinguish between authorization and permission in a community policy. In their work, a community is a distributed MAS operating in a P2P environment.…”
Section: Access Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%