2022 International Conference on IoT and Blockchain Technology (ICIBT) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icibt52874.2022.9807702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permissioned Blockchain Voting System using Hyperledger Fabric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decentralised proposals were explicit regarding the way they dealt with multiple votes, with the vast majority of them disallowing the practice. Some authors simply prohibit casting any votes after the first one, such as [101], [159], [161], [17] or [168], whereas proposals such as [152], [94] and [112] allow for multiple votes to be cast, but the system only considers the first one. In these examples, the uniqueness criterion was inferred from the system's characteristics, namely how the authors detailed how they dealt with multiple votes cast, whereas in other cases, the proposal was explicit regarding the implementation of such a criterion.…”
Section: B: Systematic Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decentralised proposals were explicit regarding the way they dealt with multiple votes, with the vast majority of them disallowing the practice. Some authors simply prohibit casting any votes after the first one, such as [101], [159], [161], [17] or [168], whereas proposals such as [152], [94] and [112] allow for multiple votes to be cast, but the system only considers the first one. In these examples, the uniqueness criterion was inferred from the system's characteristics, namely how the authors detailed how they dealt with multiple votes cast, whereas in other cases, the proposal was explicit regarding the implementation of such a criterion.…”
Section: B: Systematic Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%