1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02110725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutability of subgroups and $$\mathfrak{F}$$ -subnormality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, σ-residuals have very nice permutability properties. Using Lemma 3 (5) of [2], the argument in Lemma 3.3 of [6] proves the following result. Lemma 2.3 Let σ = {σ i : i ∈ I} be a partition of P and let G be a σ-soluble finite group.…”
Section: Residualsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Second, σ-residuals have very nice permutability properties. Using Lemma 3 (5) of [2], the argument in Lemma 3.3 of [6] proves the following result. Lemma 2.3 Let σ = {σ i : i ∈ I} be a partition of P and let G be a σ-soluble finite group.…”
Section: Residualsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To be a subgroup-closed Fitting formation is a necessary condition for a formation F to have the generalised Wielandt property for residuals as Kamornikov proved in [15]. For the sake of completeness, we include here a proof of this result.…”
Section: Proof (Proof Of Theorem 1) 1 Implies 2 It Is Clear That Everymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Interesting results in this direction can be found in the papers of S.F. Kamornikov [15] and M.C. Pedraza-Aguilera, M.D.…”
Section: Everymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By Theorem 2.1 in [1], F is a GWP-formation. Let G be an F-critical group having identity Frattini subgroup.…”
Section: Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In [1], we described the essential properties of GWP-formations. It was proved in particular that each GWP-formation is a hereditary lattice Fitting formation and the sufficiently wide class of GWPformations was distinguished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%