Permutation of UTME Multiple-Choice Test Items on Performance in Use of English and Mathematics Among Prospective Higher Education Students

Abstract

In an attempt to curtail examination malpractice, the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has been generating different paper types with a different order of test items in the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). However, the permutation of test items may compromise students’ performance unintentionally because constructive suggestions in theory and practice recommend that test items be sequenced in ascending order of difficulty. This study used data collected from a random sample of 1,226 SSIII students to ascertain whether the permutation of test items has any effect on the performance of students in two different subjects (Use of English and Mathematics). The study adopted the Equivalent Groups Quasi-Experimental Research Design with three independent groups. Findings emerged, amongst others, that there is a significant difference in the performance scores of prospective university students’ in use of English and Mathematics examintaions arranged in three different orders (ED, DE, R). There are no significant gender differences in the performance of students in Use of English and Mathematics based on test item permutation. However female students perform better than male students when test items are arranged in ascending order of difficulty while males perform better when test items are arranged in descending order of difficulty. It was concluded that the permutation of test items in UTME examination tends to affect the performance of students in Use of English and Mathematics. This finding has implications for the future conduct of UTME examinations and enrolment into higher education as the randomization of UTME test items changes the difficulty order of different paper types. It was recommended that other measures of curtailing examination malpractices that would not affect students’ academic performance should be adopted.

Towards Sustainable Educational Management: A Best Practice Model for Digital Assessments in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda

“…Educators can use AI assessment systems to assess student knowledge, save time on grading and provide students with immediate feedback on their performance (Bassey et al, 2020). AI-powered tools can also help identify students at risk of falling behind or who can benefit from additional assistance or remediation (Orsi Koch Delgado et al, 2020).…”

Predicting students’ multidimensional learning outcomes in public secondary schools: The roles of school facilities, administrative expenses and curriculum

“…Cognitive learning outcomes refer to students' knowledge, understanding, and intellectual development from their educational experiences. These can include understanding and recalling information, solving problems, analysing and synthesising information, applying knowledge to new situations, and thinking critically and creatively (Ali, 2013;Bassey & Owan, 2020). The measure of cognitive skills follows Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, including "knowledge", "comprehension", "application", "analysis", "synthesis", and "evaluation" (Bloom et al, 1956).…”

Interlinking alcohol intake, mental stress, psychotic experiences and job performance of higher institutions’ graduates

“…School performance is traditionally evaluated using grading, after examinations, presentations, submission of assignments and participation in class activities and debates. [ 1 2 3 ] Although examinations or continuous assessment scores are reasonable measures of students’ performance,[ 4 ] there is no universal consensus on the ideal method of testing or on whether components of information processing, such as abilities or conceptual understanding, are more significant. [ 4 5 ] Students should, therefore, strive to achieve acceptable performances in school and afterwards.…”