2020
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2020.1836183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutation testing in high-dimensional linear models: an empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test is based on a bias-corrected estimation and an asymptotic upper bound of its distribution. (iii) "FL" is the Freedman-Lane HD test proposed by Hemerik et al (2020) with the test statistic based on the generalized partial correlation. (iv) "DR" is the Double Residualization method in Hemerik et al (2020), which residualizes both Y and X and tests the sample correlation.…”
Section: Results Of Varying Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This test is based on a bias-corrected estimation and an asymptotic upper bound of its distribution. (iii) "FL" is the Freedman-Lane HD test proposed by Hemerik et al (2020) with the test statistic based on the generalized partial correlation. (iv) "DR" is the Double Residualization method in Hemerik et al (2020), which residualizes both Y and X and tests the sample correlation.…”
Section: Results Of Varying Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every high-dimensional regression method can be combined with this permutation method. For instance, Hemerik et al (2020) proposed the ridge regression to estimate γ:…”
Section: A1 Freedman-lane Permutation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works by Anderson and Legendre (1999); Winkler et al (2014) review and compare a number of previously proposed permutation methods for inference in linear models with nuisance parameters. Hemerik et al (2020b) show empirically that permutation tests can control type I error even in certain high dimensional linear models. Hemerik et al (2020a) develop tests for potentially mis-specified generalized linear models by randomly flipping signs of score contributions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For each ANOVA, the group-effect significance was estimated conducting a permutation test (2000 randomisations) on the F-statistics (105) This procedure was chosen as permutation tests are robust to violations of parametric statistics assumptions such as non-normality and heteroscedasticity (106), and thus well-suited for statistical analyses on datasets with relatively small and unbalanced sample sizes. All variables showing a significant group-effect (here and in the following, p-values lower than 0.05 will be considered significant), were then submitted to a post-hoc analysis with the aim of assessing which couples of groups showed significant differences.…”
Section: Statistical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%