2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2005.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutations and words counted by consecutive patterns

Abstract: Generating functions which count occurrences of consecutive sequences in a permutation or a word which matches a given pattern are studied by exploiting the combinatorics associated with symmetric functions. Our theorems take the generating function for the number of permutations which do not contain a certain pattern and give generating functions refining permutations by the both the total number of pattern matches and the number of non-overlapping pattern matches. Our methods allow us to give new proofs of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remmel and Mendes [1] proved Theorem 1.1 by applying a ring homomorphism defined on the ring Λ of symmetric functions over infinitely many variables x 1 , x 2 ,... to a simple symmetric function identity. Kitaev's original proof of Theorem 1.1 was completely different and was actually more simple than the Mendes-Remmel proof.…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Remmel and Mendes [1] proved Theorem 1.1 by applying a ring homomorphism defined on the ring Λ of symmetric functions over infinitely many variables x 1 , x 2 ,... to a simple symmetric function identity. Kitaev's original proof of Theorem 1.1 was completely different and was actually more simple than the Mendes-Remmel proof.…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mendes-Remmel proof has the advantage that it allowed them to give several extensions of Theorem 1.1 and the formula for A τ (t) referred to in (1.6) was produced as a byproduct of the proof. We will not present the Mendes-Remmel proof here as it can be found in [1]. The main goal of this section is to review the definitions in [1] that are needed to define all the terms that appear in (1.6).…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations