Tyrosine nitration is a well established protein modification occurring in vivo in a number of inflammatory diseases associated with oxidative stress and increased activity of NO synthases (1, 2). Nitration of specific tyrosine residues has been reported to affect protein structure and function (3), suggesting that 3-nitrotyrosine formation may not only be a disease marker but could be causally involved in the pathogenesis of certain disease states.Peroxynitrite, formed in a nearly diffusion-controlled reaction from NO and O 2 . , is considered a potent pathophysiologically relevant cytotoxin. Besides oxidation reactions resulting in dysfunction of various biomolecules, nitration of free and protein-bound tyrosine to yield 3-nitrotyrosine is a well established reaction of peroxynitrite that may contribute to NO cytotoxicity (1). The nitration reaction has been extensively studied in vitro by bolus addition of synthetic peroxynitrite to tyrosine-containing samples including purified proteins, cells, and tissues (3-6) . In situ, 3-nitrotyrosine was most frequently visualized with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies (2), but the identity of the product has been confirmed by several laboratories using sophisticated gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy and HPLC 1 methods (7,8). Thus, there is general agreement that (i) authentic peroxynitrite is a potent nitrating agent that converts free and proteinbound tyrosine to the corresponding 3-nitro derivative, and that (ii) 3-nitrotyrosine does occur in vivo. The conclusion that peroxynitrite is the main cause for in vivo nitration may thus seem obvious, but is not supported by experimental data. In fact, several recent studies have identified alternative pathways of tyrosine nitration (9), and we found that nitration by simultaneously generated NO and O 2 . is much less efficient than the reaction triggered by authentic peroxynitrite (10). The interpretation of the latter results has been disputed, and a number of points have been raised questioning their validity. One point was related to the possibility that urate formed in the XO reaction might have scavenged peroxynitrite and thus prevented tyrosine nitration in long term (12 h) experiments. Concerning data interpretation, we had suggested that NO and O 2 . may combine to trans-peroxynitrite, the rapid protonation of which prevents formation of the nitrating CO 2 . adduct. However, thermodynamic calculations have unambiguously identified the cis-rotamer as the more stable conformation of peroxynitrite in both gas phase (11) and aqueous solution, 2 rendering our initial hypothesis untenable. We hope to settle both issues with the present study in which we extend our earlier findings to other, urate-free NO/O 2 .-generating systems and demonstrate that the low nitrating efficiency of NO/O 2 . is explained by an unexpected dependence of nitration yields on peroxynitrite steady-state concentrations. It is shown that the reaction between tyrosine and peroxynitrite yields almost exclusively dityrosine at peroxynitrit...