2018
DOI: 10.3390/risks6040127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perpetual American Defaultable Options in Models with Random Dividends and Partial Information

Abstract: We present closed-form solutions to the perpetual American dividend-paying put and call option pricing problems in two extensions of the Black–Merton–Scholes model with random dividends under full and partial information. We assume that the dividend rate of the underlying asset price changes its value at a certain random time which has an exponential distribution and is independent of the standard Brownian motion driving the price of the underlying risky asset. In the full information version of the model, it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the point of view of financial mathematics and credit risk theory, the models in which the event or default times happen at the last passage times do not fall into the classical reduced form framework. More precisely, unlike in the existing models studied in Szimayer [50], Gapeev and Al Motairi [21], Glover and Hulley [25], Dumitrescu, Quenez, and Sulem [16], and Grigorova, Quenez, and Sulem [28], neither the immersion hypothesis nor the density hypothesis is satisfied (see Aksamit and Jeanblanc [1;Remark 5.31]), so that the default intensity process simply does not exist in our setting (see, e.g. Bielecki and Rutkowski [12; Chapter VIII] and Jeanblanc and Li [31] for the description of these concepts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…From the point of view of financial mathematics and credit risk theory, the models in which the event or default times happen at the last passage times do not fall into the classical reduced form framework. More precisely, unlike in the existing models studied in Szimayer [50], Gapeev and Al Motairi [21], Glover and Hulley [25], Dumitrescu, Quenez, and Sulem [16], and Grigorova, Quenez, and Sulem [28], neither the immersion hypothesis nor the density hypothesis is satisfied (see Aksamit and Jeanblanc [1;Remark 5.31]), so that the default intensity process simply does not exist in our setting (see, e.g. Bielecki and Rutkowski [12; Chapter VIII] and Jeanblanc and Li [31] for the description of these concepts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The model studied here differs from models studied in existing works such as Szimayer [6], Gapeev and Al Motairi [7], Glover and Hulley [8], Dumitrescu et al [9], and Grigorova et al [10], as neither the immersion hypothesis nor the density hypothesis is satisfied by the random times (or default times) θ and η, and the default intensity process simply does not exists in our setting (see, e.g., Bielecki and Rutkowski [11]). We see clearly in ( 6) and ( 7) that, in the case of zero recovery, this leads to a modified discounting factors, which are no longer functions of the sum of the interest rate and the default intensity rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that other applications of the concept described above include the consideration of perpetual American dividend-paying options with credit risk which are defaulted at the times when the underlying risky asset price processes reach such random thresholds. Other perpetual American defaultable and withdrawable dividend-paying options were recently considered in [14] and [15] in some other diffusion-type models of financial markets with full and partial information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%