2008
DOI: 10.1080/09552360802218033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perplexities of Filiality: Confucius and Jane Addams on the Private/Public Distinction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Addams' work reflected an early feminist perspective, which acknowledged power dynamics in relationships as opposed to more traditional charity approaches. She describes perplexity in both personal and professional contexts, suggesting that this way of being is a powerful holistic ingredient for social reform (Foust, 2008;Thompson, Koenig, & Spano, 2017). Her advocacy for an integrated approach aligns with binary divisions refuted by feminist scholars.…”
Section: Jane Addams and Perplexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Addams' work reflected an early feminist perspective, which acknowledged power dynamics in relationships as opposed to more traditional charity approaches. She describes perplexity in both personal and professional contexts, suggesting that this way of being is a powerful holistic ingredient for social reform (Foust, 2008;Thompson, Koenig, & Spano, 2017). Her advocacy for an integrated approach aligns with binary divisions refuted by feminist scholars.…”
Section: Jane Addams and Perplexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ames alludes to her as a ‘strong influence on Dewey’ (295n152) in his recent Confucian Role Ethics (), citing her Democracy and Social Ethics (1902) as an exception to the trend of family not being an important consideration in the evolution of Western ethical thinking. In ‘Perplexities of Filiality: Confucius and Jane Addams on the Private/Public Distinction ()’, I argue that Confucians and feminist Pragmatists can benefit from comparative engagement of Confucius and Addams with focus on the ways in which each denies a rigid division between private and public realms, avoiding negative implications that arise from such bifurcation. An integral passage for this comparison is Analects 2.21, in which Confucius equates xiao (filiality) with participation in government, disputing the notion that one who has not held a formal position in the public domain has failed to do service for one's community.…”
Section: Confucianism and Chicago Pragmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%