Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interview (PICI-1): A new revision proposal for PICI-1TA. Two single cases

Perrotta, Giulio

doi:10.17352/2455-5282.000125

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…is confronted in its fi nal and restitutive version with the "normative content" of the person (Super-Ego, according to the new PICI-2 theorization) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], which is formed from birth and over the years starting from attachment content [26] to continue with family and relational models [27] constructs (experientially derived), beliefs, and conditioning social infl uences [13], up to psychological traumas and their dysfunctional adaptations [29]. In this process, the role of emotional states (or emotions) is central, since it is thanks to them if we have the emotional-behavioral reactions, with respect to internal and external stimuli: in essence, the "emotional states" (or emotions) are basic modalities that our mind knows (and "installed" by default) thanks to which we manage to adapt to internal and external circumstances, while the "emotional-behavioral reactions" (or sentiments) are subjective emotional experiences experienced by the person thanks to the interaction of basic emotions with anxiety, and/or with the combination of two or more basic emotions.…”

Section: At This Point Perception (As a Reprocessing Of Sensation)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Referring therefore to the PICI-2 model [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and to the role of anxiety as a natural activator and/or enhancer (and not as a basic emotion, as erroneously believed until now), the origin of all psychopathologies [3,5,, according to the model under examination, is to be found in the dysfunctional management of one or both basic emotions (anguish and pleasure) and not in anxiety: in fact, working in psychotherapy on basic emotions allows to unlock anxiety (and not inverse) and consequently the vicious circle that feeds the psychopathological condition [62][63][64], Obviously, the more deeply rooted the problem is and the more one is not master of one's "emotional alphabet", the more complicated it will be to unravel the knot at the origin of the dysfunctional condition [14]. The paradigm at the base of PHEM is therefore to work directly on the emotional alphabet of the person and on the analysis of their emotions, to intervene indirectly on the anxiety that feeds and enhances the toxic, inattactive, dysfunctional and pathological pattern.…”

Section: ) Clinical Applications Of the Phem Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The “Human Emotions” and the “Perrotta Human Emotions Model” (PHEM): The new theoretical model. Historical, neurobiological and clinical profiles

Perrotta¹

2021

Arch Depress Anxiety

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Starting from the models of James-Lange, Cannon-Bard, Watson, Darwin, Ekman, Cowen-Keltner, Schachter-Singer and Mandler, a new model on the subject of human emotions, the "Perrotta Human Emotions Model" (PHEM), was prepared, which would take into account the need to order and distinguish, in a clearer and more functional way, the following concepts: (a) the "sensation" is the result of the interaction between the sense organ and the restitution of the content; (b) the "perception" is the reprocessing of the sensation, and can be of the fi rst level (when the sensation is processed in the neurobiological phase) or of the second level (when the sensation processed neurobiologically passes a second evaluation screen by the person's normative content, and then is returned through behaviors); c) the "anxiety" is the feeder of the circuit, the energetic activator; d) the "emotion" is a basic modality that allows us to adapt to internal and external circumstances; e) the "sentiments (or feelings)" is an emotional-behavioral reaction or the subjective emotional experience lived by the person thanks to the interaction of basic emotions with anxiety, and/or with the combination of sentiments, always with the aim of perfecting one's adaptation; f) the "discomfort" is a state of mind, such as tension or hyperactivity or hypoactivity, which occurs when the person experiences different feelings, depending on the factual situations; g) the "affection" is a feeling of attachment to someone or something, even material, exclusively related to the basic emotion of pleasure and in particular (but not exclusively) to the friendly and loving feelings h) the "need" is the instinctive impulse that arises to satisfy a desire and presupposes a state of necessity that if not satisfi ed brings suffering and frustration; i) the "desire" is the object of the need; j) the "need" is the degree of importance and urgency that need goes to satisfy; k) the "instinctual drive (or impulse)", unlike the Freudian concept, is any conscious or unconscious manifestation of a need. According to this new perspective, therefore, this construct is based on the hypothesis that every action/behavior arises from a need (or instinctual drive) that seeks satisfaction, and therefore the "emotional states" (or emotions) are the basic modes that our mind knows (and "installed" by default) thanks to which we can adapt to internal and external circumstances, while the "emotional-behavioral reactions" (or sentiments) are subjective emotional experiences experienced by the person thanks to the interaction of basic emotions with anxiety. In total, there are 2 emotional states (or basic emotions: anguish, and pleasure) that give rise to 152 fi rst (14/152), second (42/152), and third-level (96/152) emotional-behavioral reactions (or sentiments). Referring to the PICI-2 model and the role of anxiety as a natural "neutral" activator and/or enhancer (and not as a basic emotion as mistakenly believed by some), the origin of all psychopathologies is to be found, according to t...

show abstract

Section: At This Point Perception (As a Reprocessing Of Sensation)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Clinical Applications Of the Phem Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “Human Emotions” and the “Perrotta Human Emotions Model” (PHEM): The new theoretical model. Historical, neurobiological and clinical profiles

Perrotta¹

2021

Arch Depress Anxiety

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interviews‐3 (PICI‐3): Development, regulation, updation, and validation of the psychometric instrument for the identification of functional and dysfunctional personality traits and diagnosis of psychopathological disorders, for children (8–10 years), preadolescents (11–13 years), adolescents (14–18 years), adults (19–69 years), and elders (70–90 years)

Perrotta

2024

Ibrain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interview, second version (PICI‐2) requires structural and functional updates, based on clinical and academic experience, especially in terms of functional traits and interpretation of psychopathological disorders. The Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interviews‐3 (PICI‐3) was created and structured into four sections, dedicated to dysfunctional traits in children and pre‐adolescents (PICI‐C‐3, 8–13 years) and in adolescents, adults, and the elderly (PICI‐TA‐3, 14–90 years), to common secondary disorders (PICI‐DS‐3, 8–90 years) and functional traits (PICI‐FT‐3, 8–90 years), with the identification of all functional elements and structural aspects of personality according to the model underlying the PICI (IPM). Selecting 1732 subjects, between 8 and 90 years old, the statistical analysis showed that the psychometric test has a well‐defined and stable construct, with the variables well represented and positively correlated with other constructs already validated. In particular: (a) the PICI‐TA‐3 (Section A) was compared with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory‐2‐Restructured Form (MMPI‐2‐RF), obtaining 99.3% compatibility of results, with a Pearson's coefficient (R) of 0.999 and p < 0.001; (b) the PICI‐C‐3 (Section B) was compared with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), obtaining 94.1% compatibility of results, with a Pearson coefficient (R) of 0.969 and p < 0.001; (c) the PICI‐FT‐3 (Section D) was compared with the Big Five Personality Test (Big5), obtaining 89.4% compatibility of results, with a Pearson coefficient (R) of 0.797 and p < 0.001. The PICI‐3 is a valid, efficient, and effective psychometric tool to identify the functioning or dysfunction of personality traits for psychopathological diagnosis.

show abstract

“Perrotta Human Defense Mechanisms Questionnaire” (PDM-Q): The new psychodiagnostic tool to identify human psychological defense mechanisms and their clinical implications

Perrotta¹

2021

Arch Depress Anxiety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interview (PICI-1): A new revision proposal for PICI-1TA. Two single cases

Cited by 13 publications

References 22 publications

The “Human Emotions” and the “Perrotta Human Emotions Model” (PHEM): The new theoretical model. Historical, neurobiological and clinical profiles

The “Human Emotions” and the “Perrotta Human Emotions Model” (PHEM): The new theoretical model. Historical, neurobiological and clinical profiles

“Perrotta Human Defense Mechanisms Questionnaire” (PDM-Q): The new psychodiagnostic tool to identify human psychological defense mechanisms and their clinical implications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About