2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
46
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that mean gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in the MC than in the DC group (33.7 vs. 35.3 weeks), which is similar to data presented by other authors [8,[10][11][12][13]. According to the literature, the rates of deliveries before 37 weeks of gestation in twins vary from 52 to 60% [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that mean gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in the MC than in the DC group (33.7 vs. 35.3 weeks), which is similar to data presented by other authors [8,[10][11][12][13]. According to the literature, the rates of deliveries before 37 weeks of gestation in twins vary from 52 to 60% [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar results were presented by Leduc. In his study, the rate of preterm deliveries before 34 weeks of gestation was significantly higher in the MC group, while those before 30 weeks of gestation did not differ by chorionicity [10]. According to the literature, the rate of cesarean deliveries in twin gestations is higher than in singletons -it varies between 43 and 64% and does not differ significantly between DC and MC twins [10,13,14,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…5 Finally, IUFDs among dichorionic twins does also exist. However, this risk is considerably higher in monochorionic twins 4,15 and highlights the special attention that is required for monochorionicity, which should translate into more intensive antenatal assessments. However, the prospective risk of IUFD that was found in our study does not indicate preterm elective delivery of monochorionic twins.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] This risk is attributed to the inherent pathologic condition that is associated with delayed zygotic splitting that leads to the increased prevalence of fetal and placental malformations. However, in monochorionicdiamniotic pregnancies, the precise cause of the high rate of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies that are not complicated by congenital anomalies, twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), and/or growth restriction is not clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monochorionic twin pregnancies are at higher risk of adverse outcome than dichorionic twin pregnancies (Leduc et al, 2005;Morikawa et al, 2012;Sebire et al, 1997). Placental vascular anastomoses can lead to specific pregnancy complications, such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective intrauterine growth restriction, and death or neurologic damage of the surviving twin after sFD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%