2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2233227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence characterization and data calibration scheme for the RSS-NIR H2RG detector on SALT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digitized data are transferred from the SIDECAR to a PC relayed by a MACIE card via CameraLink. A timing controller receives the row clock from the MACIE card and controls the synchronous actions among polarization modulation, image acquisition, and data transfer remain after the reset operation (e.g., Mosby et al 2016), and which are also among the sources of noise on images.…”
Section: Overview Of the System And The Principle Of The Synchronous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digitized data are transferred from the SIDECAR to a PC relayed by a MACIE card via CameraLink. A timing controller receives the row clock from the MACIE card and controls the synchronous actions among polarization modulation, image acquisition, and data transfer remain after the reset operation (e.g., Mosby et al 2016), and which are also among the sources of noise on images.…”
Section: Overview Of the System And The Principle Of The Synchronous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the CDS lowers the frame rate and increases the dead time. Another shortcoming is the residual image or persistency due to the residual photoelectrons, which remain after the reset operation (e.g., Mosby et al 2016), and which are also among the sources of noise on images. It is known that a single reset operation cannot completely drain out the photoelectrons accumulated during the exposure.…”
Section: Overview Of the System And The Principle Of The Synchronous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelled behavior of image persistence has been used to plan observations and place operational restrictions on what astronomical sources may be observed, 6,10 and the ultimate goal is to model persistence accurately enough so that it may be corrected for in astronomical images. To our knowledge, the only instrument currently implementing a standard correction for image persistence is the WFC3cam on Hubble, which uses the model developed in Long et al 9 The correction model is based on the power-law decay model with a limited range of time validity, and a user who suspects image persistence is contaminating their data must request that a persistence map be specifically created for their data, requiring human intervention for each dataset that must be corrected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have worked to characterize the appearance and decay of persistence as a function of flux and fluence to develop phenomenological models to correct persistence in astronomical data. Mosby et al 6 and Leisenring et al 7 characterized time constants of persistence decay in the SALT RSS-NIR and JWST NIRCam detectors and found that 2-and 3-exponential decay models respectively described the persistence decay well, potentially pointing to 2 or 3 distinct trap populations. Other phenomenological models exist indicating that a power-law decay model fits the data well 8,9 indicating that a large range of trapping time constants are responsible for the observed persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%