1966
DOI: 10.1136/vr.78.14.486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of antibodies following vaccination against canine distemper and the effect of re-vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the dogs with titres in the borderline range would have responded to vaccination or might have become ill when exposed to wild virus, and this number would probably have increased as the antibody titre fell. It was impossible to predict which individuals with borderline titres would fall into which category without challenging the dogs (Pyrdie 1966, Pollock and Carmichael 1982). The titres chosen as indicative of protection erred on the side of caution and were higher than those usually recommended by the laboratory used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the dogs with titres in the borderline range would have responded to vaccination or might have become ill when exposed to wild virus, and this number would probably have increased as the antibody titre fell. It was impossible to predict which individuals with borderline titres would fall into which category without challenging the dogs (Pyrdie 1966, Pollock and Carmichael 1982). The titres chosen as indicative of protection erred on the side of caution and were higher than those usually recommended by the laboratory used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Swedish study, 70 per cent of 30 pet dogs had protective CDV titres 36 months or more after being vaccinated (Olson and others 1988). Pyrdie (1966) found that 40 of a kennel of 46 stud dogs (87 per cent) had protective titres three or more years after their last vaccination. These dogs would have been kept in optimal health and on a high plane of nutrition and may thus have been better able to mount an immune response than the ‘average’ pet dog.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum protective SN titer was set as low as 1:10 or as high as 1:96 in serologic studies (Larson, 1996; McCaw et al , 1998; Tizard and Ni, 1998; Coyne et al , 2001 b ; Gaskell et al , 2002). Several studies found that 70–100% of client-owned or isolated research animals maintained protective titers for at least 3 years (Piercy, 1961; Prydie, 1966; Robson, 1966; Olson et al , 1988, 1997; Twark and Dodds, 2000; Abdelmagid et al , 2004; Bohm et al , 2004; Gill et al , 2004; Gore et al , 2005; Ottiger et al , 2006). Others suggest that many animals may not be protected after 2 years (McCaw et al , 1998; Jozwik et al , 2004).…”
Section: Doi After Vaccination In Dogs and Catsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined the persistence of CDV SN antibodies after dogs have been vaccinated with attenuated CDV vaccines (Piercy 1961, Gorham 1966, Prydie 1966, Robson 1966, Ackermann and others 1983, Olson and others 1988, 1997, Cooper and others 1991, Chappuis 1995). Piercy (1961) reported protective CDV SN titres in six of eight dogs maintained in isolation for three to four years after they had been vaccinated with an attenuated CDV vaccine.…”
Section: Duration Of Immunity After Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%