2000
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of Memory for Ignored Lists of Digits: Areas of Developmental Constancy and Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selon le modèle TBRS, la capacité de la mémoire de travail dépend principalement de trois facteurs. Le premier facteur concerne le changement développemental dans la vitesse de déclin mémoriel et il a été étudié, par exemple, par Cowan et al (2000). Le but de cet article était donc de discuter de l'impact de deux autres facteurs.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Selon le modèle TBRS, la capacité de la mémoire de travail dépend principalement de trois facteurs. Le premier facteur concerne le changement développemental dans la vitesse de déclin mémoriel et il a été étudié, par exemple, par Cowan et al (2000). Le but de cet article était donc de discuter de l'impact de deux autres facteurs.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…This finding reinforces the conclusion that sufficient sensory memory was available at short test delays so that performance limits were not due to sensory memory decay. Also, Cowan et al (2000) found that, with the list length equal to a predetermined span for each individual, there was no overall age difference in the loss of information across test delays. (There was a difference at the final serial position but it was not enough to result in a significant age difference in list-wide decay.)…”
Section: Memory For Ignored Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unattended auditory sequences, the acoustic memory record persists for a number of seconds (Cowan et al, 1990(Cowan et al, , 2000Darwin et al, 1972;Glucksberg & Cowen, 1970;Norman, 1969). If the focus of attention could repeatedly access that record, it would be difficult to explain the limit to about 4 items recalled from unattended lists (Cowan, 2001;Cowan et al, 1999).…”
Section: Assumption 3: Single Iteration Of Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations