2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4523-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of Periodic Orbits for Perturbed Dissipative Dynamical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the system is not smooth in finite time, regularity (in space or time) of the elements J can be very difficult to prove or could be even false. Note that regularity results are primordial in the theory of perturbations of invariant sets and in particular of periodic orbits, as shown in [24] (see also [25]). Numerous authors have shown regularity properties for J in the case of dynamical systems which are not smoothness in finite time.…”
Section: ) Then There Exists a Setmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the system is not smooth in finite time, regularity (in space or time) of the elements J can be very difficult to prove or could be even false. Note that regularity results are primordial in the theory of perturbations of invariant sets and in particular of periodic orbits, as shown in [24] (see also [25]). Numerous authors have shown regularity properties for J in the case of dynamical systems which are not smoothness in finite time.…”
Section: ) Then There Exists a Setmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First, the question, whether a nondegenerate time-periodic solution to a dissipative nonlinear wave equation is locally unique (up to time shifts in the autonomous case) and whether it depends smoothly on the system parameters, is much more delicate than for ODEs or parabolic PDEs (cf., e.g., [14,15]). One reason for that is the so-called loss of derivatives for hyperbolic PDEs.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the question, whether a nondegenerate time-periodic solution to a dissipative nonlinear wave equation is locally unique (up to time shifts in the autonomous case) and whether it depends smoothly on the system parameters, is much more delicate than for ODEs or parabolic PDEs (cf., e.g., [13,14]). One reason for that is the so-called loss of derivatives for hyperbolic PDEs.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%