2002
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200205000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of Placenta Previa According to Gestational Age at Ultrasound Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
73
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
73
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of placenta praevia with previous cesarean section came out 61% which is very high (Table 1), that is clearly consistent with other renowned studies regarding this topic. [1] Similar results were also obtained in a study during the period of 1977-1983 in Loss Angeles hospital series [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The frequency of placenta praevia with previous cesarean section came out 61% which is very high (Table 1), that is clearly consistent with other renowned studies regarding this topic. [1] Similar results were also obtained in a study during the period of 1977-1983 in Loss Angeles hospital series [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, those placentas previa that yielded a placental distance from the internal cervical os of more than 3.0 cm at final examination had a mean rate of migration of 4.1 mm/wk. A slower rate of placental migration was directly related to a lesser placental distance from the internal cervical os [8,[13][14][15]. These findings are similar to those of a previous report in which the mean rates of placental migration were 0.3 and 5.4 mm/ wk for those patients who had CD versus normal vaginal delivery, respectively [5,7,[9][10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thirty-four percent, 49%, 62%, and 73% of placentas previa would persist as such if diagnosed at 20 to 23, 24 to 27, 28 to 31, and 32 to 35 weeks' gestation, respectively. 9 The process of trophotropism may explain the disappearance of the placental tissue that overlaps the internal cervical os by up to 20 mm and then is found to be only adjacent to the internal cervical os. 6 However, when the placenta previa covered the internal cervical os by more than 2.0 cm (eg, central previa), no placental migration was observed, 6 or placental migration was present but would have caused substantial bleeding requiring delivery, so no measurable migration was documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%