2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12133-010-0063-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of Simple Substances

Abstract: In this paper, we argue for a novel three dimensionalist (3D'ist) solution to the problem of persistence, i.e., cross-temporal identity. We restrict the discussion of persistence to simple substances, which do not have other substances as their parts. The account of simple substances employed in the paper is a trope-nominalist Strong Nuclear Theory (SNT), which develops Peter Simons' trope nominalism. Regarding the distinction between three dimensionalism (3D) and four dimensionalism (4D), we follow Michael De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The problem of the persistence of tropes overlaps both questions. We have discussed it in Keinänen & Hakkarainen (2010). 5 As such, being an individual differs from being a particular, which are distinct category-features of entities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The problem of the persistence of tropes overlaps both questions. We have discussed it in Keinänen & Hakkarainen (2010). 5 As such, being an individual differs from being a particular, which are distinct category-features of entities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the ability to persist and having a mereological structure are independent characteristics and so persistence is compatible with lack of part-structure. There is nothing inconsistent with mereologically atomic entities that nevertheless may stay numerically the same despite changes concerning their properties (see Keinänen and Hakkarainen 2010).…”
Section: Mereology and Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A.-S. Maurin (2002), J. Heil (2003, M. Keinänen (2005;2011) and M. Keinänen & J. Hakkarainen (2010;.…”
Section: Conclusion: Perceptions Of Relationsunclassified