2016
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent chemosis and periorbital edema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,14 The mechanism of cutaneous infiltration is not fully understood but is thought to be due to an interaction between intercellular adhesion molecules of the lymphocytes and endothelial cells. 14 Cutaneous infiltration has also been reported to be triggered by antigenic stimulation at sites of prior infections and in areas of epidermal trauma. 11,15 The diagnosis of CLL involves detection of mature, monoclonal malignant B lymphocytes through flow cytometry or biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10,14 The mechanism of cutaneous infiltration is not fully understood but is thought to be due to an interaction between intercellular adhesion molecules of the lymphocytes and endothelial cells. 14 Cutaneous infiltration has also been reported to be triggered by antigenic stimulation at sites of prior infections and in areas of epidermal trauma. 11,15 The diagnosis of CLL involves detection of mature, monoclonal malignant B lymphocytes through flow cytometry or biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 There have been 2 other case reports to date of leukemia cutis presenting as periorbital edema. 10,14 The mechanism of cutaneous infiltration is not fully understood but is thought to be due to an interaction between intercellular adhesion molecules of the lymphocytes and endothelial cells. 14 Cutaneous infiltration has also been reported to be triggered by antigenic stimulation at sites of prior infections and in areas of epidermal trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation