2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01427-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent foveal retinal detachment after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
91
1
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
91
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) resulted in a number of reports of persistent SRF after RRD surgery. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Two patterns of residual SRF have been identified, confluent and bleb-like pockets of fluid and it has been reported that fluid can take more than 12 months to resolve. The presence of persistent SRF has been attributed to several possible causes without, however, conclusive evidence for either vitrectomy vs buckling surgery, the use of encircling vs segmental scleral explant, the use or omission of gas injection, completeness of SRF drainage, or cryotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 The advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) resulted in a number of reports of persistent SRF after RRD surgery. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Two patterns of residual SRF have been identified, confluent and bleb-like pockets of fluid and it has been reported that fluid can take more than 12 months to resolve. The presence of persistent SRF has been attributed to several possible causes without, however, conclusive evidence for either vitrectomy vs buckling surgery, the use of encircling vs segmental scleral explant, the use or omission of gas injection, completeness of SRF drainage, or cryotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of persistent SRF has been attributed to several possible causes without, however, conclusive evidence for either vitrectomy vs buckling surgery, the use of encircling vs segmental scleral explant, the use or omission of gas injection, completeness of SRF drainage, or cryotherapy. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The incidence of persistent SRF varied widely among the published series, ranging from 9 to 94%. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the visual outcome is affected: some authors have suggested that persistent submacular fluid does not influence visual outcome, 6,8,10 while others have disagreed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Postoperative OCT is a particularly helpful and novel adjunct in explaining incomplete visual acuity recovery after apparent successful buckling retinal reattachment surgery, where subfoveal fluid accumulation not visible clinically or on fluorescein angiography may be identified. 1,2 The phenomenon of delayed subretinal fluid absorption causing shallow detachment presents a difficult management issue to vitreoretinal surgeons. Desatnik et al 3 report a 5-year retrospective series following pneumatic retinopexy with occurence in 4.3% of cases and time to complete absorption ranging from 10 to 26 months.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Persistent subretinal fluid has been identified by OCT in patients who have undergone successful retinal detachment surgery. [2][3][4][5][6] This fluid often cannot be seen on slit-lamp clinical examination, is not detected by fluorescein angiography and is associated with poor vision and upon its resolution with visual improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%